Ian's Editorial Nits

[ianswett]

Here are some suggestions from my first pass, but overall I think the static vs dynamic server ID allocation idea works nicely.

2 Q's:

• Is the definition of non-compliant different at LB and server in some cases?
• Might non-routable be a better term than non-compliant?

[martinduke]

Here are some suggestions from my first pass, but overall I think the static vs dynamic server ID allocation idea works nicely.

Thanks, I merged your suggestions.

2 Q's:

* Is the definition of non-compliant different at LB and server in some cases?

Yes, they can be different because the perception of the configuration is different. In general, during configuration updates the LB will have a configs that some servers don't. Therefore, a DCID with those CR bits will be compliant at the LB and non-compliant at the server.

With static allocation, servers don't do anything with non-compliant DCIDs, so this is irrelevant. With dynamic allocation, it means that the LB will allocate an SID that the server doesn't know anything about, until:

1. the allocation times out
2. the LB has the occasion to forward another packet with that SID to the server when the server has the configuration.

* Might non-routable be a better term than non-compliant?

I don't feel strongly about this, but it works for me. If you want to file a PR with this change I'd approve it.