-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 57
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
remove qvm-ng #300
remove qvm-ng #300
Conversation
I'm also sorry to see it go, but it is what it is. Do the tests still pass locally? The runner is still mad about some package renaming in CL-QUIL. |
No they don't. Some JSON library API-induced bit rot. It's probably fixable tho without too much work. If you or someone else uses it, I can fix the tests and keep it going. |
Oh I meant the tests on the rest of QVM, after the NG deletion is applied — the thing the GitHub test runner is trying & failing to do. |
Oh yes, they should be, but I'll have to double check. We need to change test runners desperately so that they're meaningful. :S |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
qvm-ngn't amiright?
R.I.P. CrustyOldDocketFile gone but not forgotten
👋🏽 😿 |
never forget QVMaaS. |
pqvm ftw |
d(-_-)bvm |
p(-_-)qvm persistent-but-only-in-our-hearts-qvm Maybe the real treasure was the PERSISTENT-QVMs we made along the way... |
Sorry to see it go, but it has not been developed, and it is not used in production.
Fixes #299 #296