You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi,
Thank you for your interest. Yes, we normally use 80 as the threshold in our own studies, although I think that it can be lower (there is no perfect threshold).
Cheers,
Qunfeng
---
Qunfeng_Dong, PhD
Pronouns: he|him|his
Director, Center for Biomedical Informatics
Professor, Department of Medicine
Stritch School of Medicine
Loyola University Chicago
2160 S. First Avenue
Maywood, Illinois 60153
Office: CTRE 459
qdong@luc.edu | 708-327-9004
http://ssom.luc.edu/cbmi/
On 10/7/20, 2:27 AM, <notifications@github.com<mailto:notifications@github.com>> wrote:
Hi,
I would have an idea for the thresold to use for filter classification.
On mothur, I use 80.
Thanks for this interesting program.
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#25>, or unsubscribe<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AEOBXEYFLTDMSNZRMHVYUVDSJQJ6LANCNFSM4SHAJLXA>.
Hi,
I would have an idea for the thresold to use for filter classification.
On mothur, I use 80.
Thanks for this interesting program.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: