Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Zenodo action: support update based on concept DOI / DOI #12

Closed
eblondel opened this issue Jul 31, 2019 · 2 comments
Closed

Zenodo action: support update based on concept DOI / DOI #12

eblondel opened this issue Jul 31, 2019 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request software:zenodo Related to Zenodo

Comments

@eblondel
Copy link
Collaborator

eblondel commented Jul 31, 2019

When a DOI is available as identifier of an entity, the Zen4R action should try to get existing Zenodo record based on this DOI, first with a attempt by Concept DOI (assuming the DOI is a concept DOI), next to get record by simple DOI. This will allow to get/update published records (update metadata only) including existing versions of a record that are uniquely identified with a DOI.

@eblondel eblondel added the enhancement New feature or request label Jul 31, 2019
@eblondel eblondel self-assigned this Jul 31, 2019
@eblondel
Copy link
Collaborator Author

This requires Zen4R feature eblondel/zen4R#21

@eblondel
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@juldebar For the time being, this allows to edit either the latest record (if the concept DOI is specified as identifier of the entity), or a specific version (if a specific DOI is specified). I've investigated the batch update of all versions for a given Zenodo record. In principle this should be feasible but this requires a major refactoring of the zen4r deposit action.

@eblondel eblondel added the software:zenodo Related to Zenodo label Sep 5, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request software:zenodo Related to Zenodo
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant