Improved cheeck-= and check-within error messages

[matteo-daddio]

Improved documentation and error messages of check-= and check-within as discussed in issue #165.

[sorawee]

You said that the PR is intended to "Improved documentation", but I don't see the documentation change anywhere. Did you forget to commit some changes?

It would be nice to write tests to make sure that the message contains the added information. Probably here. If you don't want to do that, I can merge the PR now and work on the test as a separate change, too.

But this overall looks good. Thanks!

[matteo-daddio]

Improved documentation and error messages of check-= and check-within as discussed in issue #165.

[sorawee]

Here, too.

[matteo-daddio]

Corrected.

[matteo-daddio]

I think that the tests are ok.

[sorawee]

There are more changes I'd like to make, but they are just nits, so I'll go ahead and merge this, and make the change later. In particular, I'd like to keep similarity between "For example, the following checks pass:" and "And the following checks fail:" as much as possible, so that readers can contrast them easily. That means:

• check-withinfor hash should have (hash 'C 25 'F 77) as the expected value.
• check-within for list should have the same expected value.

[matteo-daddio]

Thank you very much sorawee! Matteo d’Addio

…

________________________________ Da: sorawee ***@***.***> Inviato: Saturday, November 4, 2023 3:23:04 PM A: racket/rackunit ***@***.***> Cc: matteo-daddio ***@***.***>; Author ***@***.***> Oggetto: Re: [racket/rackunit] Improved cheeck-= and check-within error messages (PR #166) Merged #166<#166> into master. — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#166 (comment)>, or unsubscribe<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AZ2CGPIQIJSHOGYI6EPLS2TYCZFURAVCNFSM6AAAAAA62WUQ2CVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV45UABCJFZXG5LFIV3GK3TUJZXXI2LGNFRWC5DJN5XDWMJQHA3DEOJSGEZDGOI>. You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>