Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Hardware description #17

Open
ramess101 opened this issue Dec 16, 2018 · 5 comments
Open

Hardware description #17

ramess101 opened this issue Dec 16, 2018 · 5 comments

Comments

@ramess101
Copy link
Owner

@msoroush

I would like to include a one sentence description of the hardware you are using to run the cyclohexane simulations. Here is what it says so far:

image

Could you help me fill in the missing information? Also, please correct if you used a different compiler or GOMC version. Thanks!

@msoroush
Copy link
Collaborator

@ramess101

The cyclohexane results were obtained using development version of GOMC (it has not been released yet). GOMC was compiled using intel compiler 2018. I used one thread CPU for all simulations (liquid and vapor simulations). However, our cluster's hardwares are not all same.

Info: Model name: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4790K CPU @ 4.00GHz
Info: Model name: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3570 CPU @ 3.40GHz
Info: Model name: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2500K CPU @ 3.30GHz
Info: Model name: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5450 @ 3.00GHz
Info: Model name: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5355 @ 2.66GHz
Info: Model name: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2640 v3 @ 2.60GHz
Info: Model name: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q6600 @ 2.40GHz

@ramess101
Copy link
Owner Author

ramess101 commented Dec 16, 2018 via email

@msoroush
Copy link
Collaborator

@ramess101 intel compiler is twice faster than GCC. GPU performance is good when we have electrostatic energy calculation in simulation. For these systems, we dont see much speedup using GPU.

@msoroush
Copy link
Collaborator

@ramess101 For GOMC version we can use development version since we merged the rings branch to development. Maybe @jpotoff can help with this issue.

@ramess101
Copy link
Owner Author

@msoroush @jpotoff

Here is how the manuscript reads now:

image

And the SI:

image

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants