chore: Checkout [check-run-reporter](https://www.check-run-reporter.com/docs)'s reporting.

[randytarampi]

Just opting for the basic JUnit ESLint output for now, but maybe we'll go down a different reporting route, so let's cross that bridge when we get there...

[pull-assistant]

Best reviewed: commit by commit

---

Optimal code review plan

     chore: Checkout [check-run-reporter](https://www.check-run-reporter.co...

     chore(travis): Run our pretests during the script phase.

Powered by Pull Assistant. Last update 42cf9a1 ... fa9d8e8. Read the comment docs.

[ianwremmel]

JUnit is a fickle beast :)

It looks like ESLint changed their JUnit report format since I implemented its parser. You'll get better results for ESLint using the json-with-metadata outputer. Do you mind if I add your failed test reports to the test suite in order to fix the parse errors you're seeing?

[randytarampi]

Haha. Go for it.

[ianwremmel]

Fixes for both eslint and mocha JUnit parsing have been deployed. Hopefully that'll get you unblocked. Thanks for your patience!

[coveralls]

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 3562

• 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
• No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
• Overall coverage remained the same at 94.528%

---

Totals
Change from base Build 3560:	0.0%
Covered Lines:	3381
Relevant Lines:	3537

---

💛 - Coveralls

[ianwremmel]

Looks like COMMIT_SHA without a leading $ snuck back into the code somewhere. There'll be a change shortly that sends that error back to you instead of forcing me to reach out :)

[codeclimate]

Code Climate has analyzed commit 42cf9a1 and detected 13 issues on this pull request.

Here's the issue category breakdown:

Category	Count
Duplication	13

The test coverage on the diff in this pull request is 100.0% (50% is the threshold).

This pull request will bring the total coverage in the repository to 95.5%.

View more on Code Climate.