Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Drop llvm16 from cuda118-conda devcontainer image #14526

Merged

Conversation

charlesbluca
Copy link
Member

Description

Looks like the old image used for cuda11.8-conda no longer exists:

[-26553 ms] Error response from daemon: No such image: rapidsai/devcontainers:24.02-cpp-llvm16-cuda11.8-mambaforge-ubuntu22.04

On the suggestion of @trxcllnt, trying out 24.02-cpp-cuda11.8-mambaforge-ubuntu22.04 instead.

Checklist

  • I am familiar with the Contributing Guidelines.
  • New or existing tests cover these changes.
  • The documentation is up to date with these changes.

Copy link

copy-pr-bot bot commented Nov 29, 2023

This pull request requires additional validation before any workflows can run on NVIDIA's runners.

Pull request vetters can view their responsibilities here.

Contributors can view more details about this message here.

@bdice
Copy link
Contributor

bdice commented Nov 29, 2023

/ok to test

@bdice bdice added bug Something isn't working non-breaking Non-breaking change labels Nov 29, 2023
@bdice
Copy link
Contributor

bdice commented Nov 29, 2023

@charlesbluca This won't be tested by CI -- only CUDA 12 images are tested in CI. If you can verify that this works locally, I will approve and merge it.

Copy link
Contributor

@bdice bdice left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@charlesbluca
Copy link
Member Author

Yup, good catch @bdice - can make the change there too and will follow up after verifying the devcontainer builds for cuda11.8-conda|pip

@charlesbluca
Copy link
Member Author

Actually on second thought, it looks like the tag for cuda11.8-pip does exist:

https://hub.docker.com/layers/rapidsai/devcontainers/24.02-cpp-llvm16-cuda11.8-ubuntu22.04/images/sha256-250ef49bde099444f4532915423ca91a0e5d803c4921fb30d68dcac4819d65fe?context=explore

Given the fact that the cuda12.0-pip devcontainer also includes llvm16, perhaps it would be worthwhile to revisit if llvm16 is required in either of the pip containers and limit this PR to unblocking the conda devcontainers?

That being said, if we know that llvm16 isn't required for the pip devcontainers, happy to repurpose this PR to just drop that everywhere; mind if I defer to you @bdice? Don't really have too much familiarity here 😅

@cwharris
Copy link
Contributor

We want to keep llvm in the pip env containers. We want to drop it for conda. We'll get the relevant bits from conda as conda often requires we do so. Meanwhile pip is fine with system-wide deps in most cases. I think the changes look good as is.

Copy link
Contributor

@cwharris cwharris left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@charlesbluca
Copy link
Member Author

Forgot to follow up - can verify that the changes here unblocked the cuda11.8-conda devcontainer build on my end, so if things look good this should be safe to merge once tests are green 🙂

@bdice
Copy link
Contributor

bdice commented Nov 30, 2023

Thanks for the context @cwharris, I see why that makes sense to use system LLVM for pip devcontainers but wouldn’t have thought to do it otherwise.

@bdice
Copy link
Contributor

bdice commented Nov 30, 2023

/ok to test

@bdice
Copy link
Contributor

bdice commented Nov 30, 2023

/merge

@rapids-bot rapids-bot bot merged commit d528c95 into rapidsai:branch-24.02 Nov 30, 2023
67 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working non-breaking Non-breaking change
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants