Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[REVIEW] Adding to_parquet and write_partition definitions to dask_cudf #3369
[REVIEW] Adding to_parquet and write_partition definitions to dask_cudf #3369
Changes from 2 commits
322b210
5a38c47
d096061
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not sure I understand this. Is there something wrong with our metadata?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I was also a bit confused by this. It seems that
gddf = ddf.map_partitions(cudf.from_pandas)
will result in a dask_cudf dataframe with the_meta
not having the same index name ans the original dask dataframe. Is it reasonable for me to raise a separate issue?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If you can find a quick resolution to that I think that that would be ideal. If it ends up being more complicated then sure, let's wait.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Okay - Looks like the index name is dropped in
iloc
calls for cudf dataframes (and not for pandas). I'll see if the fix is simpleThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@mrocklin My idea for a simple fix doesn't seem to work - Lets address the index-name issue separately so I can focus on higher priority items in the short term.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
OK, sounds good. Happy to merge on passed tests