Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[FEA]: Investigate how readily we can support both FP32 and FP64 from python. #1099

Open
thomcom opened this issue Apr 26, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

[FEA]: Investigate how readily we can support both FP32 and FP64 from python. #1099

thomcom opened this issue Apr 26, 2023 · 2 comments
Labels
feature request New feature or request Needs Triage Need team to review and classify performance

Comments

@thomcom
Copy link
Contributor

thomcom commented Apr 26, 2023

Is this a new feature, an improvement, or a change to existing functionality?

New Feature

How would you describe the priority of this feature request

Medium

Please provide a clear description of problem you would like to solve.

Based on the performance results in #1090 it might be beneficial to enable FP32 from our python libraries. We should put a little time into investigating where FP types are locked to 64 bit and how easily we can allow both as a user option.

Describe any alternatives you have considered

No response

Additional context

No response
@thomcom thomcom added feature request New feature or request Needs Triage Need team to review and classify labels Apr 26, 2023
@jarmak-nv
Copy link
Contributor

Related: #1076

@harrism
Copy link
Member

harrism commented May 3, 2023

Related: #1023

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
feature request New feature or request Needs Triage Need team to review and classify performance
Projects
cuSpatial
Status: Todo
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@thomcom @harrism @jarmak-nv