Skip to content
This repository

BCM2708 vs. BCM2835 #22

Closed
lp0 opened this Issue May 13, 2012 · 5 comments

4 participants

Simon Arlott popcornmix poolooloo JamesH65
Simon Arlott
lp0 commented May 13, 2012

What's the correct device model to reference as the machine type and in any device drivers?

popcornmix
Owner

Technically 2708 is the family, and 2835 is a specific implementation.
We now know that 2835 is the only implementation in the family that can run linux, (and there won't be new models of this family), so it probably doesn't matter which model is used, although it should be consistent.

Simon Arlott
lp0 commented May 14, 2012

So it would be reasonable to name all the drivers 2708 but the specific device tree file 2835?

(assuming that if there is ever another model of that family that can run linux it would need a different list of devices)

popcornmix
Owner

That sounds reasonable.

Simon Arlott lp0 closed this May 15, 2012
popcornmix popcornmix referenced this issue from a commit in popcornmix/linux July 23, 2012
nfs: skip commit in releasepage if we're freeing memory for fs-relate…
…d reasons

commit 5cf02d0 upstream.

We've had some reports of a deadlock where rpciod ends up with a stack
trace like this:

    PID: 2507   TASK: ffff88103691ab40  CPU: 14  COMMAND: "rpciod/14"
     #0 [ffff8810343bf2f0] schedule at ffffffff814dabd9
     #1 [ffff8810343bf3b8] nfs_wait_bit_killable at ffffffffa038fc04 [nfs]
     #2 [ffff8810343bf3c8] __wait_on_bit at ffffffff814dbc2f
     #3 [ffff8810343bf418] out_of_line_wait_on_bit at ffffffff814dbcd8
     #4 [ffff8810343bf488] nfs_commit_inode at ffffffffa039e0c1 [nfs]
     #5 [ffff8810343bf4f8] nfs_release_page at ffffffffa038bef6 [nfs]
     #6 [ffff8810343bf528] try_to_release_page at ffffffff8110c670
     #7 [ffff8810343bf538] shrink_page_list.clone.0 at ffffffff81126271
     #8 [ffff8810343bf668] shrink_inactive_list at ffffffff81126638
     #9 [ffff8810343bf818] shrink_zone at ffffffff8112788f
    #10 [ffff8810343bf8c8] do_try_to_free_pages at ffffffff81127b1e
    #11 [ffff8810343bf958] try_to_free_pages at ffffffff8112812f
    #12 [ffff8810343bfa08] __alloc_pages_nodemask at ffffffff8111fdad
    #13 [ffff8810343bfb28] kmem_getpages at ffffffff81159942
    #14 [ffff8810343bfb58] fallback_alloc at ffffffff8115a55a
    #15 [ffff8810343bfbd8] ____cache_alloc_node at ffffffff8115a2d9
    #16 [ffff8810343bfc38] kmem_cache_alloc at ffffffff8115b09b
    #17 [ffff8810343bfc78] sk_prot_alloc at ffffffff81411808
    #18 [ffff8810343bfcb8] sk_alloc at ffffffff8141197c
    #19 [ffff8810343bfce8] inet_create at ffffffff81483ba6
    #20 [ffff8810343bfd38] __sock_create at ffffffff8140b4a7
    #21 [ffff8810343bfd98] xs_create_sock at ffffffffa01f649b [sunrpc]
    #22 [ffff8810343bfdd8] xs_tcp_setup_socket at ffffffffa01f6965 [sunrpc]
    #23 [ffff8810343bfe38] worker_thread at ffffffff810887d0
    #24 [ffff8810343bfee8] kthread at ffffffff8108dd96
    #25 [ffff8810343bff48] kernel_thread at ffffffff8100c1ca

rpciod is trying to allocate memory for a new socket to talk to the
server. The VM ends up calling ->releasepage to get more memory, and it
tries to do a blocking commit. That commit can't succeed however without
a connected socket, so we deadlock.

Fix this by setting PF_FSTRANS on the workqueue task prior to doing the
socket allocation, and having nfs_release_page check for that flag when
deciding whether to do a commit call. Also, set PF_FSTRANS
unconditionally in rpc_async_schedule since that function can also do
allocations sometimes.

Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
1c88c58
popcornmix popcornmix referenced this issue from a commit February 22, 2012
x86: Remove some noise from boot log when starting cpus
Printing the "start_ip" for every secondary cpu is very noisy on a large
system - and doesn't add any value. Drop this message.

Console log before:
Booting Node   0, Processors  #1
smpboot cpu 1: start_ip = 96000
 #2
smpboot cpu 2: start_ip = 96000
 #3
smpboot cpu 3: start_ip = 96000
 #4
smpboot cpu 4: start_ip = 96000
       ...
 #31
smpboot cpu 31: start_ip = 96000
Brought up 32 CPUs

Console log after:
Booting Node   0, Processors  #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 Ok.
Booting Node   1, Processors  #8 #9 #10 #11 #12 #13 #14 #15 Ok.
Booting Node   0, Processors  #16 #17 #18 #19 #20 #21 #22 #23 Ok.
Booting Node   1, Processors  #24 #25 #26 #27 #28 #29 #30 #31
Brought up 32 CPUs

Acked-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@amd64.org>
Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/4f452eb42507460426@agluck-desktop.sc.intel.com
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
140f190
popcornmix popcornmix referenced this issue from a commit May 30, 2012
ftang1 x86/reboot: Fix a warning message triggered by stop_other_cpus()
When rebooting our 24 CPU Westmere servers with 3.4-rc6, we
always see this warning msg:

Restarting system.
machine restart
------------[ cut here ]------------
WARNING: at arch/x86/kernel/smp.c:125
native_smp_send_reschedule+0x74/0xa7() Hardware name: X8DTN
Modules linked in: igb [last unloaded: scsi_wait_scan]
Pid: 1, comm: systemd-shutdow Not tainted 3.4.0-rc6+ #22
Call Trace:
 <IRQ>  [<ffffffff8102a41f>] warn_slowpath_common+0x7e/0x96
 [<ffffffff8102a44c>] warn_slowpath_null+0x15/0x17
 [<ffffffff81018cf7>] native_smp_send_reschedule+0x74/0xa7
 [<ffffffff810561c1>] trigger_load_balance+0x279/0x2a6
 [<ffffffff81050112>] scheduler_tick+0xe0/0xe9
 [<ffffffff81036768>] update_process_times+0x60/0x70
 [<ffffffff81062f2f>] tick_sched_timer+0x68/0x92
 [<ffffffff81046e33>] __run_hrtimer+0xb3/0x13c
 [<ffffffff81062ec7>] ? tick_nohz_handler+0xd0/0xd0
 [<ffffffff810474f2>] hrtimer_interrupt+0xdb/0x198
 [<ffffffff81019a35>] smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x81/0x94
 [<ffffffff81655187>] apic_timer_interrupt+0x67/0x70
 <EOI>  [<ffffffff8101a3c4>] ? default_send_IPI_mask_allbutself_phys+0xb4/0xc4
 [<ffffffff8101c680>] physflat_send_IPI_allbutself+0x12/0x14
 [<ffffffff81018db4>] native_nmi_stop_other_cpus+0x8a/0xd6
 [<ffffffff810188ba>] native_machine_shutdown+0x50/0x67
 [<ffffffff81018926>] machine_shutdown+0xa/0xc
 [<ffffffff8101897e>] native_machine_restart+0x20/0x32
 [<ffffffff810189b0>] machine_restart+0xa/0xc
 [<ffffffff8103b196>] kernel_restart+0x47/0x4c
 [<ffffffff8103b2e6>] sys_reboot+0x13e/0x17c
 [<ffffffff8164e436>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_bh+0x10/0x12
 [<ffffffff810fcac9>] ? bdi_queue_work+0xcf/0xd8
 [<ffffffff810fe82f>] ? __bdi_start_writeback+0xae/0xb7
 [<ffffffff810e0d64>] ? iterate_supers+0xa3/0xb7
 [<ffffffff816547a2>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
---[ end trace 320af5cb1cb60c5b ]---

The root cause seems to be the
default_send_IPI_mask_allbutself_phys() takes quite some time (I
measured it could be several ms) to complete sending NMIs to all
the other 23 CPUs, and for HZ=250/1000 system, the time is long
enough for a timer interrupt to happen, which will in turn
trigger to kick load balance to a stopped CPU and cause this
warning in native_smp_send_reschedule().

So disabling the local irq before stop_other_cpu() can fix this
problem (tested 25 times reboot ok), and it is fine as there
should be nobody caring the timer interrupt in such reboot
stage.

The latest 3.4 kernel slightly changes this behavior by sending
REBOOT_VECTOR first and only send NMI_VECTOR if the REBOOT_VCTOR
fails, and this patch is still needed to prevent the problem.

Signed-off-by: Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com>
Acked-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20120530231541.4c13433a@feng-i7
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
55c844a
popcornmix popcornmix referenced this issue from a commit June 06, 2012
x86/smp: Fix topology checks on AMD MCM CPUs
The warning below triggers on AMD MCM packages because physical package
IDs on the cores of a _physical_ socket are the same. I.e., this field
says which CPUs belong to the same physical package.

However, the same two CPUs belong to two different internal, i.e.
"logical" nodes in the same physical socket which is reflected in the
CPU-to-node map on x86 with NUMA.

Which makes this check wrong on the above topologies so circumvent it.

[    0.444413] Booting Node   0, Processors  #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 Ok.
[    0.461388] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[    0.465997] WARNING: at arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c:310 topology_sane.clone.1+0x6e/0x81()
[    0.473960] Hardware name: Dinar
[    0.477170] sched: CPU #6's mc-sibling CPU #0 is not on the same node! [node: 1 != 0]. Ignoring dependency.
[    0.486860] Booting Node   1, Processors  #6
[    0.491104] Modules linked in:
[    0.494141] Pid: 0, comm: swapper/6 Not tainted 3.4.0+ #1
[    0.499510] Call Trace:
[    0.501946]  [<ffffffff8144bf92>] ? topology_sane.clone.1+0x6e/0x81
[    0.508185]  [<ffffffff8102f1fc>] warn_slowpath_common+0x85/0x9d
[    0.514163]  [<ffffffff8102f2b7>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x46/0x48
[    0.519881]  [<ffffffff8144bf92>] topology_sane.clone.1+0x6e/0x81
[    0.525943]  [<ffffffff8144c234>] set_cpu_sibling_map+0x251/0x371
[    0.532004]  [<ffffffff8144c4ee>] start_secondary+0x19a/0x218
[    0.537729] ---[ end trace 4eaa2a86a8e2da22 ]---
[    0.628197]  #7 #8 #9 #10 #11 Ok.
[    0.807108] Booting Node   3, Processors  #12 #13 #14 #15 #16 #17 Ok.
[    0.897587] Booting Node   2, Processors  #18 #19 #20 #21 #22 #23 Ok.
[    0.917443] Brought up 24 CPUs

We ran a topology sanity check test we have here on it and
it all looks ok... hopefully :).

Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com>
Cc: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20120529135442.GE29157@aftab.osrc.amd.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
161270f
popcornmix popcornmix referenced this issue from a commit July 23, 2012
nfs: skip commit in releasepage if we're freeing memory for fs-relate…
…d reasons

We've had some reports of a deadlock where rpciod ends up with a stack
trace like this:

    PID: 2507   TASK: ffff88103691ab40  CPU: 14  COMMAND: "rpciod/14"
     #0 [ffff8810343bf2f0] schedule at ffffffff814dabd9
     #1 [ffff8810343bf3b8] nfs_wait_bit_killable at ffffffffa038fc04 [nfs]
     #2 [ffff8810343bf3c8] __wait_on_bit at ffffffff814dbc2f
     #3 [ffff8810343bf418] out_of_line_wait_on_bit at ffffffff814dbcd8
     #4 [ffff8810343bf488] nfs_commit_inode at ffffffffa039e0c1 [nfs]
     #5 [ffff8810343bf4f8] nfs_release_page at ffffffffa038bef6 [nfs]
     #6 [ffff8810343bf528] try_to_release_page at ffffffff8110c670
     #7 [ffff8810343bf538] shrink_page_list.clone.0 at ffffffff81126271
     #8 [ffff8810343bf668] shrink_inactive_list at ffffffff81126638
     #9 [ffff8810343bf818] shrink_zone at ffffffff8112788f
    #10 [ffff8810343bf8c8] do_try_to_free_pages at ffffffff81127b1e
    #11 [ffff8810343bf958] try_to_free_pages at ffffffff8112812f
    #12 [ffff8810343bfa08] __alloc_pages_nodemask at ffffffff8111fdad
    #13 [ffff8810343bfb28] kmem_getpages at ffffffff81159942
    #14 [ffff8810343bfb58] fallback_alloc at ffffffff8115a55a
    #15 [ffff8810343bfbd8] ____cache_alloc_node at ffffffff8115a2d9
    #16 [ffff8810343bfc38] kmem_cache_alloc at ffffffff8115b09b
    #17 [ffff8810343bfc78] sk_prot_alloc at ffffffff81411808
    #18 [ffff8810343bfcb8] sk_alloc at ffffffff8141197c
    #19 [ffff8810343bfce8] inet_create at ffffffff81483ba6
    #20 [ffff8810343bfd38] __sock_create at ffffffff8140b4a7
    #21 [ffff8810343bfd98] xs_create_sock at ffffffffa01f649b [sunrpc]
    #22 [ffff8810343bfdd8] xs_tcp_setup_socket at ffffffffa01f6965 [sunrpc]
    #23 [ffff8810343bfe38] worker_thread at ffffffff810887d0
    #24 [ffff8810343bfee8] kthread at ffffffff8108dd96
    #25 [ffff8810343bff48] kernel_thread at ffffffff8100c1ca

rpciod is trying to allocate memory for a new socket to talk to the
server. The VM ends up calling ->releasepage to get more memory, and it
tries to do a blocking commit. That commit can't succeed however without
a connected socket, so we deadlock.

Fix this by setting PF_FSTRANS on the workqueue task prior to doing the
socket allocation, and having nfs_release_page check for that flag when
deciding whether to do a commit call. Also, set PF_FSTRANS
unconditionally in rpc_async_schedule since that function can also do
allocations sometimes.

Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
5cf02d0
Stephen Warren swarren referenced this issue from a commit in swarren/linux-rpi July 05, 2013
bridge: fix some kernel warning in multicast timer
Several people reported the warning: "kernel BUG at kernel/timer.c:729!"
and the stack trace is:

	#7 [ffff880214d25c10] mod_timer+501 at ffffffff8106d905
	#8 [ffff880214d25c50] br_multicast_del_pg.isra.20+261 at ffffffffa0731d25 [bridge]
	#9 [ffff880214d25c80] br_multicast_disable_port+88 at ffffffffa0732948 [bridge]
	#10 [ffff880214d25cb0] br_stp_disable_port+154 at ffffffffa072bcca [bridge]
	#11 [ffff880214d25ce8] br_device_event+520 at ffffffffa072a4e8 [bridge]
	#12 [ffff880214d25d18] notifier_call_chain+76 at ffffffff8164aafc
	#13 [ffff880214d25d50] raw_notifier_call_chain+22 at ffffffff810858f6
	#14 [ffff880214d25d60] call_netdevice_notifiers+45 at ffffffff81536aad
	#15 [ffff880214d25d80] dev_close_many+183 at ffffffff81536d17
	#16 [ffff880214d25dc0] rollback_registered_many+168 at ffffffff81537f68
	#17 [ffff880214d25de8] rollback_registered+49 at ffffffff81538101
	#18 [ffff880214d25e10] unregister_netdevice_queue+72 at ffffffff815390d8
	#19 [ffff880214d25e30] __tun_detach+272 at ffffffffa074c2f0 [tun]
	#20 [ffff880214d25e88] tun_chr_close+45 at ffffffffa074c4bd [tun]
	#21 [ffff880214d25ea8] __fput+225 at ffffffff8119b1f1
	#22 [ffff880214d25ef0] ____fput+14 at ffffffff8119b3fe
	#23 [ffff880214d25f00] task_work_run+159 at ffffffff8107cf7f
	#24 [ffff880214d25f30] do_notify_resume+97 at ffffffff810139e1
	#25 [ffff880214d25f50] int_signal+18 at ffffffff8164f292

this is due to I forgot to check if mp->timer is armed in
br_multicast_del_pg(). This bug is introduced by
commit 9f00b2e7cf241fa389733d41b6 (bridge: only expire the mdb entry
when query is received).

Same for __br_mdb_del().

Tested-by: poma <pomidorabelisima@gmail.com>
Reported-by: LiYonghua <809674045@qq.com>
Reported-by: Robert Hancock <hancockrwd@gmail.com>
Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <amwang@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
c7e8e8a
popcornmix popcornmix referenced this issue from a commit September 05, 2013
x86/smpboot: Fix announce_cpu() to printk() the last "OK" properly
When booting secondary CPUs, announce_cpu() is called to show which cpu has
been brought up. For example:

[    0.402751] smpboot: Booting Node   0, Processors  #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 OK
[    0.525667] smpboot: Booting Node   1, Processors  #6 #7 #8 #9 #10 #11 OK
[    0.755592] smpboot: Booting Node   0, Processors  #12 #13 #14 #15 #16 #17 OK
[    0.890495] smpboot: Booting Node   1, Processors  #18 #19 #20 #21 #22 #23

But the last "OK" is lost, because 'nr_cpu_ids-1' represents the maximum
possible cpu id. It should use the maximum present cpu id in case not all
CPUs booted up.

Signed-off-by: Libin <huawei.libin@huawei.com>
Cc: <guohanjun@huawei.com>
Cc: <wangyijing@huawei.com>
Cc: <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Cc: <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1378378676-18276-1-git-send-email-huawei.libin@huawei.com
[ tweaked the changelog, removed unnecessary line break, tweaked the format to align the fields vertically. ]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
5223948
Stephen Warren swarren referenced this issue from a commit in swarren/linux-rpi September 17, 2013
percpu: fix bootmem error handling in pcpu_page_first_chunk()
If memory allocation of in pcpu_embed_first_chunk() fails, the
allocated memory is not released correctly. In the release loop also
the non-allocated elements are released which leads to the following
kernel BUG on systems with very little memory:

[    0.000000] kernel BUG at mm/bootmem.c:307!
[    0.000000] illegal operation: 0001 [#1] PREEMPT SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC
[    0.000000] Modules linked in:
[    0.000000] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 3.10.0 #22
[    0.000000] task: 0000000000a20ae0 ti: 0000000000a08000 task.ti: 0000000000a08000
[    0.000000] Krnl PSW : 0400000180000000 0000000000abda7a (__free+0x116/0x154)
[    0.000000]            R:0 T:1 IO:0 EX:0 Key:0 M:0 W:0 P:0 AS:0 CC:0 PM:0 EA:3
...
[    0.000000]  [<0000000000abdce2>] mark_bootmem_node+0xde/0xf0
[    0.000000]  [<0000000000abdd9c>] mark_bootmem+0xa8/0x118
[    0.000000]  [<0000000000abcbba>] pcpu_embed_first_chunk+0xe7a/0xf0c
[    0.000000]  [<0000000000abcc96>] setup_per_cpu_areas+0x4a/0x28c

To fix the problem now only allocated elements are released. This then
leads to the correct kernel panic:

[    0.000000] Kernel panic - not syncing: Failed to initialize percpu areas.
...
[    0.000000] Call Trace:
[    0.000000] ([<000000000011307e>] show_trace+0x132/0x150)
[    0.000000]  [<0000000000113160>] show_stack+0xc4/0xd4
[    0.000000]  [<00000000007127dc>] dump_stack+0x74/0xd8
[    0.000000]  [<00000000007123fe>] panic+0xea/0x264
[    0.000000]  [<0000000000b14814>] setup_per_cpu_areas+0x5c/0x28c

tj: Flipped if conditional so that it doesn't need "continue".

Signed-off-by: Michael Holzheu <holzheu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
f851c8d
Stephen Warren swarren referenced this issue from a commit in swarren/linux-rpi September 27, 2013
x86: Improve the printout of the SMP bootup CPU table
As the new x86 CPU bootup printout format code maintainer, I am
taking immediate action to improve and clean (and thus indulge
my OCD) the reporting of the cores when coming up online.

Fix padding to a right-hand alignment, cleanup code and bind
reporting width to the max number of supported CPUs on the
system, like this:

 [    0.074509] smpboot: Booting Node   0, Processors:      #1  #2  #3  #4  #5  #6  #7 OK
 [    0.644008] smpboot: Booting Node   1, Processors:  #8  #9 #10 #11 #12 #13 #14 #15 OK
 [    1.245006] smpboot: Booting Node   2, Processors: #16 #17 #18 #19 #20 #21 #22 #23 OK
 [    1.864005] smpboot: Booting Node   3, Processors: #24 #25 #26 #27 #28 #29 #30 #31 OK
 [    2.489005] smpboot: Booting Node   4, Processors: #32 #33 #34 #35 #36 #37 #38 #39 OK
 [    3.093005] smpboot: Booting Node   5, Processors: #40 #41 #42 #43 #44 #45 #46 #47 OK
 [    3.698005] smpboot: Booting Node   6, Processors: #48 #49 #50 #51 #52 #53 #54 #55 OK
 [    4.304005] smpboot: Booting Node   7, Processors: #56 #57 #58 #59 #60 #61 #62 #63 OK
 [    4.961413] Brought up 64 CPUs

and this:

 [    0.072367] smpboot: Booting Node   0, Processors:    #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 OK
 [    0.686329] Brought up 8 CPUs

Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: Libin <huawei.libin@huawei.com>
Cc: wangyijing@huawei.com
Cc: fenghua.yu@intel.com
Cc: guohanjun@huawei.com
Cc: paul.gortmaker@windriver.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20130927143554.GF4422@pd.tnic
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
646e29a
Stephen Warren swarren referenced this issue from a commit in swarren/linux-rpi September 30, 2013
x86/boot: Further compress CPUs bootup message
Turn it into (for example):

[    0.073380] x86: Booting SMP configuration:
[    0.074005] .... node   #0, CPUs:          #1   #2   #3   #4   #5   #6   #7
[    0.603005] .... node   #1, CPUs:     #8   #9  #10  #11  #12  #13  #14  #15
[    1.200005] .... node   #2, CPUs:    #16  #17  #18  #19  #20  #21  #22  #23
[    1.796005] .... node   #3, CPUs:    #24  #25  #26  #27  #28  #29  #30  #31
[    2.393005] .... node   #4, CPUs:    #32  #33  #34  #35  #36  #37  #38  #39
[    2.996005] .... node   #5, CPUs:    #40  #41  #42  #43  #44  #45  #46  #47
[    3.600005] .... node   #6, CPUs:    #48  #49  #50  #51  #52  #53  #54  #55
[    4.202005] .... node   #7, CPUs:    #56  #57  #58  #59  #60  #61  #62  #63
[    4.811005] .... node   #8, CPUs:    #64  #65  #66  #67  #68  #69  #70  #71
[    5.421006] .... node   #9, CPUs:    #72  #73  #74  #75  #76  #77  #78  #79
[    6.032005] .... node  #10, CPUs:    #80  #81  #82  #83  #84  #85  #86  #87
[    6.648006] .... node  #11, CPUs:    #88  #89  #90  #91  #92  #93  #94  #95
[    7.262005] .... node  #12, CPUs:    #96  #97  #98  #99 #100 #101 #102 #103
[    7.865005] .... node  #13, CPUs:   #104 #105 #106 #107 #108 #109 #110 #111
[    8.466005] .... node  #14, CPUs:   #112 #113 #114 #115 #116 #117 #118 #119
[    9.073006] .... node  #15, CPUs:   #120 #121 #122 #123 #124 #125 #126 #127
[    9.679901] x86: Booted up 16 nodes, 128 CPUs

and drop useless elements.

Change num_digits() to hpa's division-avoiding, cell-phone-typed
version which he went at great lengths and pains to submit on a
Saturday evening.

Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: huawei.libin@huawei.com
Cc: wangyijing@huawei.com
Cc: fenghua.yu@intel.com
Cc: guohanjun@huawei.com
Cc: paul.gortmaker@windriver.com
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20130930095624.GB16383@pd.tnic
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
a17bce4
Stephen Warren swarren referenced this issue from a commit in swarren/linux-rpi November 30, 2013
fabioestevam ARM: 7907/1: lib: delay-loop: Add align directive to fix BogoMIPS cal…
…culation

Currently mx53 (CortexA8) running at 1GHz reports:
Calibrating delay loop... 663.55 BogoMIPS (lpj=3317760)

Tom Evans verified that alignments of 0x0 and 0x8 run the two instructions of __loop_delay in one clock cycle (1 clock/loop), while alignments of 0x4 and 0xc take 3 clocks to run the loop twice. (1.5 clock/loop)

The original object code looks like this:

00000010 <__loop_const_udelay>:
  10:	e3e01000 	mvn	r1, #0
  14:	e51f201c 	ldr	r2, [pc, #-28]	; 0 <__loop_udelay-0x8>
  18:	e5922000 	ldr	r2, [r2]
  1c:	e0800921 	add	r0, r0, r1, lsr #18
  20:	e1a00720 	lsr	r0, r0, #14
  24:	e0822b21 	add	r2, r2, r1, lsr #22
  28:	e1a02522 	lsr	r2, r2, #10
  2c:	e0000092 	mul	r0, r2, r0
  30:	e0800d21 	add	r0, r0, r1, lsr #26
  34:	e1b00320 	lsrs	r0, r0, #6
  38:	01a0f00e 	moveq	pc, lr

0000003c <__loop_delay>:
  3c:	e2500001 	subs	r0, r0, #1
  40:	8afffffe 	bhi	3c <__loop_delay>
  44:	e1a0f00e 	mov	pc, lr

After adding the 'align 3' directive to __loop_delay (align to 8 bytes):

00000010 <__loop_const_udelay>:
  10:	e3e01000 	mvn	r1, #0
  14:	e51f201c 	ldr	r2, [pc, #-28]	; 0 <__loop_udelay-0x8>
  18:	e5922000 	ldr	r2, [r2]
  1c:	e0800921 	add	r0, r0, r1, lsr #18
  20:	e1a00720 	lsr	r0, r0, #14
  24:	e0822b21 	add	r2, r2, r1, lsr #22
  28:	e1a02522 	lsr	r2, r2, #10
  2c:	e0000092 	mul	r0, r2, r0
  30:	e0800d21 	add	r0, r0, r1, lsr #26
  34:	e1b00320 	lsrs	r0, r0, #6
  38:	01a0f00e 	moveq	pc, lr
  3c:	e320f000 	nop	{0}

00000040 <__loop_delay>:
  40:	e2500001 	subs	r0, r0, #1
  44:	8afffffe 	bhi	40 <__loop_delay>
  48:	e1a0f00e 	mov	pc, lr
  4c:	e320f000 	nop	{0}

, which now reports:
Calibrating delay loop... 996.14 BogoMIPS (lpj=4980736)

Some more test results:

On mx31 (ARM1136) running at 532 MHz, before the patch:
Calibrating delay loop... 351.43 BogoMIPS (lpj=1757184)

On mx31 (ARM1136) running at 532 MHz after the patch:
Calibrating delay loop... 528.79 BogoMIPS (lpj=2643968)

Also tested on mx6 (CortexA9) and on mx27 (ARM926), which shows the same
BogoMIPS value before and after this patch.

Reported-by: Tom Evans <tom_usenet@optusnet.com.au>
Suggested-by: Tom Evans <tom_usenet@optusnet.com.au>
Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
11d4bb1
poolooloo

can any one tell me how to change the boot picture to a processing bar like windows on bcm2835 running raspbian.I hava tried bootsplash(my kernel is 3.10.y,so it has no patch to help),plymouth(no grub)--hard to use,splashy(hard to port to arm),someone can help me ?

JamesH65
Collaborator

I'm afraid you have posted this in completely the wrong place. I'd suggest posting on the Raspberry Pi forums. This issue has been closed for two years and is unrelated to your question.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Something went wrong with that request. Please try again.