rp2_common/pico_standard_link: linker script fixes #1539
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The resulting elf binaries contained an unusual section that leads to an error when objcopy attempts to update a section (e.g. when using the picowota combined build mechanism). This seemed to be due to the order of sections, where two RAM-only sections were split by a RAM/FLASH section. By moving the RAM-only sections together, this issue disappeared.
mungewell
pushed a commit
to mungewell/pico-sdk
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 18, 2024
The resulting elf binaries contained an unusual section that leads to an error when objcopy attempts to update a section (e.g. when using the picowota combined build mechanism). This seemed to be due to the order of sections, where two RAM-only sections were split by a RAM/FLASH section. By moving the RAM-only sections together, this issue disappeared.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The resulting elf binaries contained an unusual section that leads to an error when
objcopyattempts to update a section (e.g. when using the picowota combined build mechanism).This is due to the order of sections, where two
RAMsections were separate by aRAM AT>FLASHsection. The documentation oflddescribes that theAT>FLASHis effectively "sticky", so that the nextRAMsection behaves as ifAT>FLASHwas specified (which is not intended). By moving the RAM-only sections together, this issue is solved.Fixes #1538 (see this issue for a detailed analysis)