Refine invitations workflow #149
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…e, format timestamps on UI, colorize current user and inviter/invitee
rdnt
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 30, 2023
Former-commit-id: fb71cc9fc6858f14dcfd3e839a6335f2f0e9156d Former-commit-id: 683bb12b34ded2646071bbbf090ce5118a6cea0f
rdnt
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 30, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Invitations should be revisited to address multiple invitation creation for the same keystore as well as access revocation APIs and workflows.