Use actions/toolkit

[LecrisUT]

The github actions documentation encourages using actions/toolkit

Ok, this one became more complicated than initially thought. Changing from a composite action to a js action requires a compilation step of a dist/index.js file. Not sure if it's worth having the additional steps.

---

📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://readthedocs-preview--30.org.readthedocs.build/en/30/

[humitos]

Hi! I'm a little new on the GitHub Actions world. Can you please explain to me what are the benefits of actions/toolkit over the current pattern we are following here?

[LecrisUT]

Initially I thought it can make it cleaner and more in line with upstream documentation, but having to enforce a compilation workflow is a bit of a disadvantage. Maybe if we push compilation commits automatically, it wouldn't be that bad.

Other than that there can be some benefits:

• One less checkout action to call and manage. All source is directly accessed by the current action caller. This also ensures that other gh action callers can use a fork version for testing
• Simpler reusability
• Allows to use external libraries from npm
• Unit testing eventually