Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature: Studio: Select multiple rows #928

Closed
bmunkholm opened this issue Sep 3, 2018 · 2 comments
Closed

Feature: Studio: Select multiple rows #928

bmunkholm opened this issue Sep 3, 2018 · 2 comments

Comments

@bmunkholm
Copy link
Contributor

@rubengarciam commented on Mon Dec 04 2017

Goals

Select multiple rows and perform the same action on them (i.e, 'delete')

Expected Results

Saving ridiculous amount of time

Actual Results

None, one by one


@nirinchev commented on Mon Dec 04 2017

Ping @kraenhansen


@kraenhansen commented on Wed Dec 13 2017

Can you think of other operations than bulk deletion that this could be useful for?


@astigsen commented on Wed Dec 13 2017

Drag-n-drop


@rubengarciam commented on Thu Dec 14 2017

@kraenhansen any operation on either the full items or specific properties would definitely be welcomed


@calumk commented on Tue Jan 23 2018

+1
I Cant believe this isn't implemented

Studio seems to me to be larger, (150mb bigger - but electron based and cross platform, so i understand why)
And less functional than browser was, and missing many of the features i would expect from a database editor.

Things missing that were in browser
Keyboard shortcuts (add new row)
Lock?
Export CSV

Things that are annoying
MODALS EVERYWHERE- in browser, you could add an object (using a shortcut) and then you simply clicked the object to edit. Database applications really don't need Modals with delays and transition animations, and opacity. its just irritating.

Why cant I edit schema in the studio?
Ok so it might not be 100% the best way to do it, but sometimes you just dont need to migrate everything, I just wanna add or delete a row, or change the datatype, If I'm in the early stage of development, Why cant i just do that in the studio?

I would really expect something like SQLiteStudio (or many other database applications)
Because this just feels so... limiting,
screen shot 2018-01-23 at 11 51 39


@rubengarciam commented on Thu Jan 25 2018

@calumk totally agree. I miss the browser


@rubengarciam commented on Thu Jan 25 2018

(sorry, closed it by mistake)


@bigfish24 commented on Thu Jan 25 2018

Just a heads up, this feature is in review internally and we hope to get it released in the coming week.

@calumk appreciate the feedback and it is definitely noted on our end. In adding the create object functionality we debated the modal UI, but ultimately it was the easier to implement so our plan was to get that done and then later add the editing in line. AppKit provides a lot of this out of the box compared to JS (like keyboard shortcuts too), so I apologize that it isn't as optimized right now. We would love if we had the resources to maintain a native app for all platforms but given resources we felt we could deliver more functionality to more users via Electron, so hopefully you can bear with us while we improve.

Your note about schema editing is actually one area where the current app is ahead of Realm Browser. We never had any schema editing in Realm Browser, whereas you can perform additive changes in Realm Studio (new classes, new properties). You can't do destructive changes because we focused on the schema migrations supported with synced Realms first. Adding full support of changes with local Realms is our plan.


@calumk commented on Thu Jan 25 2018

@bigfish24 Great to hear some feedback on this, sorry if my original post was a bit harshly worded.

100% agree electron is the right way to go with an app like this, cross-platform is obviously the best for everyone going forward, even if we get a slightly bigger program as a result.

Could i suggest that you upload the codebase to github? I imagine it would be better to have topics like this on the specific repo, instead of on the object server repo


@bigfish24 commented on Fri Jan 26 2018

🙌 glad you agree with strategy and no worries on tone, I would rather have passionate feedback than none at all!

Agree it would be better to move these topics to Studio repo, but at this time we have not made a decision to open source it.


@bmunkholm commented on Mon Sep 03 2018

@calumk Studio is now open source, so I'll move this issue there for further comments.

@nirinchev
Copy link
Member

Isn't that implemented already?

@kraenhansen
Copy link
Member

This feature was shipped with Realm Studio v1.20.0.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Mar 19, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants