You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This SVM tech is some simple stuff that should be checked out before going full on deep and convolutional. SVM is what was state-of-the-art a decade ago before deep learning stole the spotlight.
Really nice 2018 paper out of France. Simple, fast techniques (SVM classifier) simply looking at "z-pixels" (i.e. array of pixel intensities on the thin Z plane of a microscope slide; the colored curves). Basically, classifying SVM is light absorption around cell.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This could be interesting. Say the SVM classifier can guess that something is in an area even if it cannot see it. If there is a break in a reconstruction, if the break endpoints are connected within a volume contiguously classified as probably containing something that might be a candidate for connecting the two endpoints.
Instead of z-index use radius from line of SWC. I.e. walk vectors perpendicular to the SWC vectors. This is the path through the cell membrane which is a detector we want.
This SVM tech is some simple stuff that should be checked out before going full on deep and convolutional. SVM is what was state-of-the-art a decade ago before deep learning stole the spotlight.
Identification of individual cells from z-stacks of bright-field microscopy images This
Really nice 2018 paper out of France. Simple, fast techniques (SVM classifier) simply looking at "z-pixels" (i.e. array of pixel intensities on the thin Z plane of a microscope slide; the colored curves). Basically, classifying SVM is light absorption around cell.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: