Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug 2099724: utils: fix name of the mcv resource #47

Conversation

raghavendra-talur
Copy link
Collaborator

Co-Authored-by: Raghavendra M raghavendra@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Raghavendra Talur raghavendra.talur@gmail.com

Co-Authored-by: Raghavendra M <raghavendra@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Raghavendra Talur <raghavendra.talur@gmail.com>
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 27, 2022

@raghavendra-talur: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'Bug XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

In response to this:

utils: fix name of the mcv resource

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 27, 2022

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: raghavendra-talur

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@raghavendra-talur raghavendra-talur changed the title utils: fix name of the mcv resource Bug 2099724 : utils: fix name of the mcv resource Jun 27, 2022
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 27, 2022

@raghavendra-talur: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'Bug XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

In response to this:

Bug 2099724 : utils: fix name of the mcv resource

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@raghavendra-talur raghavendra-talur changed the title Bug 2099724 : utils: fix name of the mcv resource Bug 2099724: utils: fix name of the mcv resource Jun 27, 2022
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 27, 2022

@raghavendra-talur: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2099724, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to be in one of the following states: NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST, but it is MODIFIED instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Bug 2099724: utils: fix name of the mcv resource

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@raghavendra-talur
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 27, 2022

@raghavendra-talur: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2099724, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (ODF 4.11.0) matches configured target release for branch (ODF 4.11.0)
  • bug is in the state ASSIGNED, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @keesturam

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 27, 2022

@openshift-ci[bot]: GitHub didn't allow me to request PR reviews from the following users: keesturam.

Note that only red-hat-storage members and repo collaborators can review this PR, and authors cannot review their own PRs.

In response to this:

@raghavendra-talur: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2099724, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (ODF 4.11.0) matches configured target release for branch (ODF 4.11.0)
  • bug is in the state ASSIGNED, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @keesturam

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@ShyamsundarR ShyamsundarR merged commit 01d374e into red-hat-storage:release-4.11 Jun 27, 2022
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 27, 2022

@raghavendra-talur: Bugzilla bug 2099724 is in an unrecognized state (MODIFIED) and will not be moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Bug 2099724: utils: fix name of the mcv resource

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@raghavendra-talur raghavendra-talur deleted the rtalur-backport-2eca6f4 branch July 14, 2022 18:16
ShyamsundarR pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 26, 2022
- to use this feature (disable KubeObjectProtection), add the following to your Ramen ConfigMap: kubeObjectProtection.disabled = true
- by default, this feature is disabled, meaning that kubeObjectProtection can be used when configured
- if kubeObjectProtection is not enabled or this switch is on, kubeObjectProtection will be disabled

Signed-off-by: Travis Janssen <travis.janssen@ibm.com>
(cherry picked from commit 08dd777)
BenamarMk pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 24, 2022
- to use this feature (disable KubeObjectProtection), add the following to your Ramen ConfigMap: kubeObjectProtection.disabled = true
- by default, this feature is disabled, meaning that kubeObjectProtection can be used when configured
- if kubeObjectProtection is not enabled or this switch is on, kubeObjectProtection will be disabled

Signed-off-by: Travis Janssen <travis.janssen@ibm.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants