Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add Redux Support #839

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Jan 25, 2017
Merged

Add Redux Support #839

merged 9 commits into from
Jan 25, 2017

Conversation

sresant
Copy link
Contributor

@sresant sresant commented Jan 18, 2017

This pr relates to #788... adding support for redux.

The package provides a RootProvider which can be used to wrap your RootElement components with a single RootProvider rather then a provider for each RootElement. Additionally a ReduxAdapter(Can this be a better name?) class which provides developers the ability to wait for specific values to be available in the state tree. I have also included two test pages to showcase each usage.

Let me know what you think and how I can improve it!

@sresant sresant added the enhancement New functionality. label Jan 18, 2017
@@ -0,0 +1,60 @@
const Q = require('q');
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

prefer native promises -- no need to take a dep

const state = this.store.getState();
const stateKeys = Object.keys(this.stateWaitMap);

for (let i = 0; i < stateKeys.length; i++) {
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe it would be easier to read if you used a forEach?

Object.keys(this.stateWaitMap).forEach(stateKey => {
  if (stateKey.promise.isPending()) {

when(stateProps) {
const promises = stateProps.map((stateProp) => {
if (!this.stateWaitMap.hasOwnProperty(stateProp)) {
this.stateWaitMap[stateProp] = Q.defer();
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

new Promise()...

this.checkStateStatus();
const unsub = this.store.subscribe(this.checkStateStatus.bind(this));

return Q.all(promises).then(() => {
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Promise.all()...


class RootProvider extends React.Component {
render() {
if (!this.props.store) throw("Error Root Provider expects a store passed in as a prop");
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: include the braces here

}

RootProvider.isRootProvider = function(element) {
return element && element.props && element.props._isRootProvider;
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

prefer a symbol for this, e.g.

const rootProviderSymbol = Symbol();
class RootProvider extends React.Component {
  [rootProviderSymbol]: true,
  static isRootProvider(elem) { 
    return elem[rootProviderSymbol];
  }
}

"description": "Package to support Redux in React-Server",
"main": "index.js",
"scripts": {
"test": "echo \"Error: no test specified\" && exit 0"
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

☹️

@@ -0,0 +1,76 @@
import {createStore, applyMiddleware} from "redux"; // eslint-disable-line
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why disable the linter for all these?

"url": "https://github.com/redfin/react-server"
},
"keywords": [
"redux"
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

maybe toss a react server mention in there?

{
"name": "react-server-redux",
"version": "0.5.1",
"description": "Package to support Redux in React-Server",
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think it might be self-evident its a package, so maybe just "Redux support for React Server"?

@doug-wade
Copy link
Collaborator

Could you also update the redux example? The test-pages are a great start, but I'd like a "minimal example" so I can think about the api.

@sresant sresant merged commit bebff8a into redfin:master Jan 25, 2017
@drewpc drewpc modified the milestones: Production ready, 0.6.0 Jan 27, 2017
@ptomasroos ptomasroos mentioned this pull request Mar 13, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New functionality.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants