Skip to content

Testing with Python 3 and additional testing facilities #91

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Sep 23, 2020

Conversation

rafie
Copy link
Contributor

@rafie rafie commented Sep 22, 2020

No description provided.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 22, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #91 into master will increase coverage by 3.00%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master      #91      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   88.34%   91.35%   +3.00%     
==========================================
  Files          12       12              
  Lines        1579     1584       +5     
==========================================
+ Hits         1395     1447      +52     
+ Misses        184      137      -47     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
redisearch/client.py 88.32% <ø> (+8.83%) ⬆️
test/test.py 98.87% <100.00%> (+3.57%) ⬆️
redisearch/aggregation.py 76.19% <0.00%> (+0.14%) ⬆️
redisearch/querystring.py 77.53% <0.00%> (+0.67%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 1873733...4469aba. Read the comment docs.

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities (and Security Hotspot 0 Security Hotspots to review)
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
0.0% 0.0% Duplication

@rafie rafie merged commit 324e147 into master Sep 23, 2020
@ashtul ashtul deleted the rafi-python3-1 branch October 6, 2020 20:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants