(URGNET) Identifier to retrieve CCDS Recommendation 2 (1970)

[manuelfuenmayor]

We need to reference this page: https://www.bipm.org/en/committees/cc/cctf/5-1970/resolution-2.
What would be the correct identifier to retrieve data from 1970-02.yaml?

[manuelfuenmayor]

We also need to refer to this page: https://www.bipm.org/en/committees/ci/cipm/50-1961/resolution-

[ronaldtse]

@manuel489 the proper identifier is "CCDS Resolution 1970-05" or "CCTF Resolution 1970-05". Does this not work?

We also need to refer to this page: https://www.bipm.org/en/committees/ci/cipm/50-1961/resolution-

The data source of this resolution is available at https://github.com/metanorma/bipm-data-outcomes/blob/main/cipm/meetings-en/meeting-50.yml

[manuelfuenmayor]

the proper identifier is "CCDS Resolution 1970-05" or "CCTF Resolution 1970-05". Does this not work?

@ronaldtse, seems like it is not working yet:

[relaton-calconnect] ("CCDS Resolution 1970-05") fetching...
[relaton-calconnect] ("CCTF Resolution 1970-05") fetching...
[relaton-calconnect] WARNING: no match found online for CCDS Resolution 1970-05. The code must be exactly like it is on the standards website.
[relaton-calconnect] WARNING: no match found online for CCTF Resolution 1970-05. The code must be exactly like it is on the standards website.

Curiously, the identifiers are being related to CALCONNECT instead of BIPM.
I've compiled with relaton-bipm 1.11.6.

[manuelfuenmayor]

I've also tried with CCDS Recommendation 02 (1970) as identifier. Which should be the proper way?

[relaton-calconnect] ("CCDS Recommendation 02 (1970)") fetching...
[relaton-calconnect] WARNING: no match found online for CCDS Recommendation 02. The code must be exactly like it is on the standards website.

[ronaldtse]

Curiously, the identifiers are being related to CALCONNECT instead of BIPM.

That is wrong. @andrew2net can you please help here?

[andrew2net]

Curiously, the identifiers are being related to CALCONNECT instead of BIPM.

it's fixed in the relaton-bipm 1.11.7 and relaton 1.11.3

the proper identifier is "CCDS Resolution 1970-05" or "CCTF Resolution 1970-05". Does this not work?

We don't have CCDS body in bipm-data-outcomes. For CCTF body there are "CCTF Recommendation 1970-02" and "CCTF Meetings 5" document.

[manuelfuenmayor]

We don't have CCDS body in bipm-data-outcomes. For CCTF body there are "CCTF Recommendation 1970-02" and "CCTF Meetings 5" document.

@andrew2net CCDS is the same as CCTF. It's just an old body name that was used before CCTF.
So this identifier: "CCDS Recommendation 1970-02", should be equivalent to "CCTF Recommendation 1970-02".

[manuelfuenmayor]

For more information, please check point 2 from this thread: metanorma/metanorma-bipm#164

[andrew2net]

@manuel489 can we close this issue?

[manuelfuenmayor]

@andrew2net I've confirmed that identiers with CCTF body name fetch properly.
However, as far as I understand, we also need to support CCDS body name.
It just would be to make CCDS=CCTF.

And one last question, what would be the proper identifier to fetch
from this file: https://github.com/metanorma/bipm-data-outcomes/blob/main/cipm/meetings-en/meeting-50.yml
(Note that this is a Meeting, not a specific resolution.)

[andrew2net]

And one last question, what would be the proper identifier to fetch
from this file: https://github.com/metanorma/bipm-data-outcomes/blob/main/cipm/meetings-en/meeting-50.yml
(Note that this is a Meeting, not a specific resolution.)

@manuel489 CIPM Meetings 50

[manuelfuenmayor]

Confirmed, thanks!