You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I would like to put all code for the high-level representation of the bytecode in a module High that has submodules Class, Instruction, Field, Attribute, Method, and so on.
At the moment, we have both the old high-level representation (Class, Instruction, Attribute, ....) and the new high-level representation (HighClass and its submodules HighInstruction, HighAttribute, ...) In a few instances I could not understand OCaml's name resolution rules when one has both module A and module B.A, so I think it's a bad idea to have both Instruction and High.Instruction. In other words, the renaming that I propose here should be done only after we get rid of the old high-level representation altogether.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I would like to put all code for the high-level representation of the bytecode in a module High that has submodules Class, Instruction, Field, Attribute, Method, and so on.
At the moment, we have both the old high-level representation (Class, Instruction, Attribute, ....) and the new high-level representation (HighClass and its submodules HighInstruction, HighAttribute, ...) In a few instances I could not understand OCaml's name resolution rules when one has both module A and module B.A, so I think it's a bad idea to have both Instruction and High.Instruction. In other words, the renaming that I propose here should be done only after we get rid of the old high-level representation altogether.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: