Add skos:*Match alignment to other terms?

[no-reply]

We have a few matches to PREMIS and Europeana statements in the existing turtle. We should review this and consider adding links to other statement so there is a consistent level of relation at launch time.

[anarchivist]

Do we want to keep this as an open issue?

[kestlund]

Unless there are specific vocabularies we want to examine, I would recommend closing.

[aisaac]

I think I'd like to keep it open, if just to be sure we're having a rather good (if not complete) coverage of the vocabularies we have already (PREMIS and Europeana).

Unless someone can certify that we have done it already? I feel stupid, but I can't remember, and the completeness/representativeness of our matches is not mentioned in the list of open/closed modeling issues (this I've checked).
On 10/20/15 7:17 PM, Karen Estlund wrote:

Unless there are specific vocabularies we want to examine, I would recommend closing.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub #20 (comment).

[anarchivist]

Closing; will be creating new discussion as needed for new alignments.