Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Check for overlaps between different fields #122

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 9, 2022
Merged

Check for overlaps between different fields #122

merged 1 commit into from
Jun 9, 2022

Conversation

pavelkryukov
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented May 18, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #122 (88f74cc) into master (2bc2275) will increase coverage by 0.03%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #122      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   95.75%   95.79%   +0.03%     
==========================================
  Files           3        3              
  Lines         636      642       +6     
==========================================
+ Hits          609      615       +6     
  Misses         27       27              
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
parse.py 93.77% <100.00%> (+0.04%) ⬆️
test.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

📣 Codecov can now indicate which changes are the most critical in Pull Requests. Learn more

@pavelkryukov pavelkryukov changed the title Check for overlaps between single bits and ranges Check for overlaps between different fields May 18, 2022
@neelgala
Copy link
Collaborator

neelgala commented Jun 9, 2022

@aswaterman please merge this after #124

@aswaterman aswaterman merged commit 08ca2b1 into riscv:master Jun 9, 2022
@pavelkryukov pavelkryukov deleted the overlap branch June 9, 2022 13:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants