Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(compaction): optimize compaction overlapping level #15736

Merged

Conversation

Little-Wallace
Copy link
Contributor

I hereby agree to the terms of the RisingWave Labs, Inc. Contributor License Agreement.

What's changed and what's your intention?

This PR try to solve the problem which RisingWave meet a large barrier and flush a lot of files in one overlapping-level. We must compact it in one simple task.
The merge iterator must seek all sstable and it could get the smallest key, it will create a lot of pending read IO. This operation will always cause our task fail.

TODO:
we shall also refactor the timeout and retry strategy of compaction iterator

Checklist

  • I have written necessary rustdoc comments
  • I have added necessary unit tests and integration tests
  • I have added test labels as necessary. See details.
  • I have added fuzzing tests or opened an issue to track them. (Optional, recommended for new SQL features Sqlsmith: Sql feature generation #7934).
  • My PR contains breaking changes. (If it deprecates some features, please create a tracking issue to remove them in the future).
  • All checks passed in ./risedev check (or alias, ./risedev c)
  • My PR changes performance-critical code. (Please run macro/micro-benchmarks and show the results.)
  • My PR contains critical fixes that are necessary to be merged into the latest release. (Please check out the details)

Documentation

  • My PR needs documentation updates. (Please use the Release note section below to summarize the impact on users)

Release note

If this PR includes changes that directly affect users or other significant modifications relevant to the community, kindly draft a release note to provide a concise summary of these changes. Please prioritize highlighting the impact these changes will have on users.

Signed-off-by: Little-Wallace <bupt2013211450@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Little-Wallace <bupt2013211450@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Little-Wallace <bupt2013211450@gmail.com>
Copy link
Contributor

@Li0k Li0k left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Rest LGTM, PTAL @zwang28 @hzxa21

});
}
assert!(!groups.is_empty());
groups.into_iter().map(|group| group.ssts).collect_vec()
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

IMO, we can add a warning log to determine the efficiency of the grouping algorithm. (If sst is all unordered, the grouping algorithm may fail, so that we can find problems faster).

question: What can we do if the grouping algorithm fails?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I add a log info after calling this method

Copy link
Collaborator

@hzxa21 hzxa21 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@Little-Wallace Little-Wallace added this pull request to the merge queue Mar 28, 2024
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks Mar 28, 2024
Signed-off-by: Little-Wallace <bupt2013211450@gmail.com>
@Little-Wallace Little-Wallace added this pull request to the merge queue Mar 28, 2024
Merged via the queue into risingwavelabs:main with commit 390465c Mar 28, 2024
26 of 27 checks passed
@Little-Wallace Little-Wallace deleted the walace/optimize-overlapping branch March 28, 2024 06:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants