Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Add tree implementation for non-recursive watchers (inotify, kqueue) #5

Closed
rjeczalik opened this issue Sep 16, 2014 · 1 comment
Closed

Add tree implementation for non-recursive watchers (inotify, kqueue) #5

rjeczalik opened this issue Sep 16, 2014 · 1 comment
Assignees
@rjeczalik

Comments

@rjeczalik
Copy link
Owner

No description provided.

@rjeczalik rjeczalik self-assigned this Sep 16, 2014
@rjeczalik rjeczalik changed the title Add dispatch implementation for non-recursive watchers (inotify) Add runtime implementation for non-recursive watchers (inotify) Sep 24, 2014
@rjeczalik rjeczalik changed the title Add runtime implementation for non-recursive watchers (inotify) Add runtime implementation for non-recursive watchers (inotify, kqueue) Oct 5, 2014
@rjeczalik rjeczalik mentioned this issue Oct 11, 2014
Merged
5 tasks
@rjeczalik rjeczalik mentioned this issue Oct 19, 2014
Merged
13 tasks
rjeczalik added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 22, 2014
@rjeczalik
tree: implement RecursiveRewatch for non-recursive watchers (#5)
d8a61e1
@rjeczalik
Copy link
Owner Author

The task is done after Tree gets abstracted into interface, and implementation split into two trees - one for faked recursive watchers (which uses notify.Watcher, mainly kqueue, poller and inotify) and second for native ones (which uses notify.RecursiveWatcher - readdirectorychangesw, fsevents).

@rjeczalik rjeczalik changed the title Add runtime implementation for non-recursive watchers (inotify, kqueue) Add tree implementation for non-recursive watchers (inotify, kqueue) Jan 26, 2015
@rjeczalik rjeczalik mentioned this issue Jan 26, 2015
Closed
3 tasks
rjeczalik added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 12, 2015
@rjeczalik
notify: build TestIsDirCreateEvent only for recursive watchers
54473ba 
It would not work for inotify, kqueue until #5 is not ready.
rjeczalik added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 12, 2015
@rjeczalik
notify: add internal event for nonrecursiveTree (#5)
c04bb6b
rjeczalik added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 23, 2015
@rjeczalik
implement Watch for non-recursive tree
d385987 
Part of #5.
rjeczalik added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 23, 2015
@rjeczalik
implement Stop for non-recursive tree
55ddae1 
Part of #5.
rjeczalik added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 23, 2015
@rjeczalik
implement Stop for non-recursive tree
d792207 
Part of #5.
rjeczalik added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 23, 2015
@rjeczalik
implement Watch for non-recursive tree
c5d7aed 
Part of #5.
rjeczalik added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 23, 2015
@rjeczalik
implement Stop for non-recursive tree
95fb4cc 
Part of #5.
rjeczalik added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 23, 2015
@rjeczalik
implement watching on newly created directories
cf0da97 
Closes #5.
rjeczalik added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 25, 2015
@rjeczalik
implement Watch for non-recursive tree
4f78a83 
Part of #5.
rjeczalik added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 25, 2015
@rjeczalik
implement Stop for non-recursive tree
3dddcc3 
Part of #5.
rjeczalik added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 25, 2015
@rjeczalik
(wip) implement watching on newly created directories
bce4451 
Closes #5.
rjeczalik added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 25, 2015
@rjeczalik
(wip) implement watching on newly created directories
82c3d1e 
Closes #5.
rjeczalik added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 26, 2015
@rjeczalik
implement watching on newly created directories
85d4c32 
Closes #5.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@rjeczalik rjeczalik

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@rjeczalik