Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use subprocess instead of Popen #203

Open
stonier opened this issue Aug 21, 2015 · 0 comments
Open

Use subprocess instead of Popen #203

stonier opened this issue Aug 21, 2015 · 0 comments

Comments

@stonier
Copy link
Member

stonier commented Aug 21, 2015

Or perhaps the futures api can do this better?

@stonier stonier added this to the Gopher milestone Aug 21, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant