Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

iCubGenova11 S/N:050 – Left thumb oppose encoder readings are not valid #1668

Closed
xEnVrE opened this issue Oct 30, 2023 · 2 comments
Closed
Assignees
Labels
iCubGenova11 S/N:050 iCub2.7 S/N:050

Comments

@xEnVrE
Copy link

xEnVrE commented Oct 30, 2023

Robot Name πŸ€–

iCubGenova11 S/N:050

Request/Failure description

After #1647, @AntonioAzocar noticed that the left thumb oppose of the robot was not calibrating and the encoder readings were strange and out of scale.

Detailed context

The following screenshot, taken from #1647, shows the status of the thumb oppose joint after the failed calibration:

image

Additional context

No response

How does it affect you?

No response

@github-actions github-actions bot changed the title Left thumb oppose encoder readings are not valid iCubGenova11 S/N:050 – Left thumb oppose encoder readings are not valid Oct 30, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot added the iCubGenova11 S/N:050 iCub2.7 S/N:050 label Oct 30, 2023
@AntonioConsilvio
Copy link
Contributor

AntonioConsilvio commented Nov 7, 2023

Hi @xEnVrE, there was a calibration problem on the thumb proximal.

I recalibrated the joint and tested the robot.

It works properly now!

Left-thumb.mp4

Remember to update the configuration files, here the PR:

Since the robot has been tested, I am closing the issue, if you have any problems regarding this issue, feel free to reopen it.

cc @sgiraz

@xEnVrE
Copy link
Author

xEnVrE commented Nov 7, 2023

Thanks a lot @AntonioConsilvio !

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
iCubGenova11 S/N:050 iCub2.7 S/N:050
Projects
Status: Done
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants