Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(deps): bump logback-classic from 1.4.14 to 1.5.5 #203

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

rodobarcaaa
Copy link
Owner

About this PR

📦 Updates ch.qos.logback:logback-classic from 1.4.14 to 1.5.5

Usage

Please merge!

I'll automatically update this PR to resolve conflicts as long as you don't change it yourself.

If you'd like to skip this version, you can just close this PR. If you have any feedback, just mention me in the comments below.

Configure Scala Steward for your repository with a .scala-steward.conf file.

Have a fantastic day writing Scala!

⚙ Adjust future updates

Add this to your .scala-steward.conf file to ignore future updates of this dependency:

updates.ignore = [ { groupId = "ch.qos.logback", artifactId = "logback-classic" } ]

Or, add this to slow down future updates of this dependency:

dependencyOverrides = [{
  pullRequests = { frequency = "30 days" },
  dependency = { groupId = "ch.qos.logback", artifactId = "logback-classic" }
}]
labels: library-update, early-semver-minor, semver-spec-minor, commit-count:1

Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Apr 14, 2024

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
No data about Duplication

See analysis details on SonarCloud

Copy link

Tests report

41 tests   41 ✅  1s ⏱️
 7 suites   0 💤
 7 files     0 ❌

Results for commit fdb3cde.

@rodobarcaaa
Copy link
Owner Author

Superseded by #205.

@rodobarcaaa rodobarcaaa deleted the update/logback-classic-1.5.5 branch April 21, 2024 00:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants