Merge pull request #71 from rogpeppe/023-fmtsort

fmtsort: copy from stdlib

fmtsort/export_test.go

@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+// Copyright 2018 The Go Authors. All rights reserved.
+// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style
+// license that can be found in the LICENSE file.
+
+package fmtsort
+
+import "reflect"
+
+func Compare(a, b reflect.Value) int {
+	return compare(a, b)
+}
+
+const BrokenNaNs = brokenNaNs

fmtsort/mapelem.go

@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+// +build go1.12
+
+package fmtsort
+
+import "reflect"
+
+const brokenNaNs = false
+
+func mapElems(mapValue reflect.Value) ([]reflect.Value, []reflect.Value) {
+	key := make([]reflect.Value, mapValue.Len())
+	value := make([]reflect.Value, len(key))
+	iter := mapValue.MapRange()
+	for i := 0; iter.Next(); i++ {
+		key[i] = iter.Key()
+		value[i] = iter.Value()
+	}
+	return key, value
+}

fmtsort/mapelem_1.11.go

@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
+// +build !go1.12
+
+package fmtsort
+
+import "reflect"
+
+const brokenNaNs = true
+
+func mapElems(mapValue reflect.Value) ([]reflect.Value, []reflect.Value) {
+	key := mapValue.MapKeys()
+	value := make([]reflect.Value, len(key))
+	for i, k := range key {
+		v := mapValue.MapIndex(k)
+		if !v.IsValid() {
+			// Note: we can't retrieve the value, probably because
+			// the key is NaN, so just do the best we can and
+			// add a zero value of the correct type in that case.
+			v = reflect.Zero(mapValue.Type().Elem())
+		}
+		value[i] = v
+	}
+	return key, value
+}

fmtsort/sort.go

@@ -0,0 +1,210 @@
+// Copyright 2018 The Go Authors. All rights reserved.
+// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style
+// license that can be found in the LICENSE file.
+
+// Package fmtsort provides a general stable ordering mechanism
+// for maps, on behalf of the fmt and text/template packages.
+// It is not guaranteed to be efficient and works only for types
+// that are valid map keys.
+package fmtsort
+
+import (
+	"reflect"
+	"sort"
+)
+
+// Note: Throughout this package we avoid calling reflect.Value.Interface as
+// it is not always legal to do so and it's easier to avoid the issue than to face it.
+
+// SortedMap represents a map's keys and values. The keys and values are
+// aligned in index order: Value[i] is the value in the map corresponding to Key[i].
+type SortedMap struct {
+	Key   []reflect.Value
+	Value []reflect.Value
+}
+
+func (o *SortedMap) Len() int           { return len(o.Key) }
+func (o *SortedMap) Less(i, j int) bool { return compare(o.Key[i], o.Key[j]) < 0 }
+func (o *SortedMap) Swap(i, j int) {
+	o.Key[i], o.Key[j] = o.Key[j], o.Key[i]
+	o.Value[i], o.Value[j] = o.Value[j], o.Value[i]
+}
+
+// Sort accepts a map and returns a SortedMap that has the same keys and
+// values but in a stable sorted order according to the keys, modulo issues
+// raised by unorderable key values such as NaNs.
+//
+// The ordering rules are more general than with Go's < operator:
+//
+//  - when applicable, nil compares low
+//  - ints, floats, and strings order by <
+//  - NaN compares less than non-NaN floats
+//  - bool compares false before true
+//  - complex compares real, then imag
+//  - pointers compare by machine address
+//  - channel values compare by machine address
+//  - structs compare each field in turn
+//  - arrays compare each element in turn.
+//    Otherwise identical arrays compare by length.
+//  - interface values compare first by reflect.Type describing the concrete type
+//    and then by concrete value as described in the previous rules.
+//
+func Sort(mapValue reflect.Value) *SortedMap {
+	if mapValue.Type().Kind() != reflect.Map {
+		return nil
+	}
+	key, value := mapElems(mapValue)
+	sorted := &SortedMap{
+		Key:   key,
+		Value: value,
+	}
+	sort.Stable(sorted)
+	return sorted
+}
+
+// compare compares two values of the same type. It returns -1, 0, 1
+// according to whether a > b (1), a == b (0), or a < b (-1).
+// If the types differ, it returns -1.
+// See the comment on Sort for the comparison rules.
+func compare(aVal, bVal reflect.Value) int {
+	aType, bType := aVal.Type(), bVal.Type()
+	if aType != bType {
+		return -1 // No good answer possible, but don't return 0: they're not equal.
+	}
+	switch aVal.Kind() {
+	case reflect.Int, reflect.Int8, reflect.Int16, reflect.Int32, reflect.Int64:
+		a, b := aVal.Int(), bVal.Int()
+		switch {
+		case a < b:
+			return -1
+		case a > b:
+			return 1
+		default:
+			return 0
+		}
+	case reflect.Uint, reflect.Uint8, reflect.Uint16, reflect.Uint32, reflect.Uint64, reflect.Uintptr:
+		a, b := aVal.Uint(), bVal.Uint()
+		switch {
+		case a < b:
+			return -1
+		case a > b:
+			return 1
+		default:
+			return 0
+		}
+	case reflect.String:
+		a, b := aVal.String(), bVal.String()
+		switch {
+		case a < b:
+			return -1
+		case a > b:
+			return 1
+		default:
+			return 0
+		}
+	case reflect.Float32, reflect.Float64:
+		return floatCompare(aVal.Float(), bVal.Float())
+	case reflect.Complex64, reflect.Complex128:
+		a, b := aVal.Complex(), bVal.Complex()
+		if c := floatCompare(real(a), real(b)); c != 0 {
+			return c
+		}
+		return floatCompare(imag(a), imag(b))
+	case reflect.Bool:
+		a, b := aVal.Bool(), bVal.Bool()
+		switch {
+		case a == b:
+			return 0
+		case a:
+			return 1
+		default:
+			return -1
+		}
+	case reflect.Ptr:
+		a, b := aVal.Pointer(), bVal.Pointer()
+		switch {
+		case a < b:
+			return -1
+		case a > b:
+			return 1
+		default:
+			return 0
+		}
+	case reflect.Chan:
+		if c, ok := nilCompare(aVal, bVal); ok {
+			return c
+		}
+		ap, bp := aVal.Pointer(), bVal.Pointer()
+		switch {
+		case ap < bp:
+			return -1
+		case ap > bp:
+			return 1
+		default:
+			return 0
+		}
+	case reflect.Struct:
+		for i := 0; i < aVal.NumField(); i++ {
+			if c := compare(aVal.Field(i), bVal.Field(i)); c != 0 {
+				return c
+			}
+		}
+		return 0
+	case reflect.Array:
+		for i := 0; i < aVal.Len(); i++ {
+			if c := compare(aVal.Index(i), bVal.Index(i)); c != 0 {
+				return c
+			}
+		}
+		return 0
+	case reflect.Interface:
+		if c, ok := nilCompare(aVal, bVal); ok {
+			return c
+		}
+		c := compare(reflect.ValueOf(aVal.Elem().Type()), reflect.ValueOf(bVal.Elem().Type()))
+		if c != 0 {
+			return c
+		}
+		return compare(aVal.Elem(), bVal.Elem())
+	default:
+		// Certain types cannot appear as keys (maps, funcs, slices), but be explicit.
+		panic("bad type in compare: " + aType.String())
+	}
+}
+
+// nilCompare checks whether either value is nil. If not, the boolean is false.
+// If either value is nil, the boolean is true and the integer is the comparison
+// value. The comparison is defined to be 0 if both are nil, otherwise the one
+// nil value compares low. Both arguments must represent a chan, func,
+// interface, map, pointer, or slice.
+func nilCompare(aVal, bVal reflect.Value) (int, bool) {
+	if aVal.IsNil() {
+		if bVal.IsNil() {
+			return 0, true
+		}
+		return -1, true
+	}
+	if bVal.IsNil() {
+		return 1, true
+	}
+	return 0, false
+}
+
+// floatCompare compares two floating-point values. NaNs compare low.
+func floatCompare(a, b float64) int {
+	switch {
+	case isNaN(a):
+		return -1 // No good answer if b is a NaN so don't bother checking.
+	case isNaN(b):
+		return 1
+	case a < b:
+		return -1
+	case a > b:
+		return 1
+	}
+	return 0
+}
+
+func isNaN(a float64) bool {
+	return a != a
+}