Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Deep array indexing #88

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 24, 2018
Merged

Deep array indexing #88

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 24, 2018

Conversation

kvark
Copy link
Collaborator

@kvark kvark commented Jan 24, 2018

Follow-up to #86 that supports nested arrays (ouch).

@kvark kvark requested a review from torkleyy January 24, 2018 19:13
@kvark kvark mentioned this pull request Jan 24, 2018
Merged
torkleyy
torkleyy approved these changes Jan 24, 2018
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@torkleyy torkleyy left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Didn't see that either :(

@kvark
Copy link
Collaborator Author

kvark commented Jan 24, 2018

bors r=torkleyy

bors bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 24, 2018
@bors
Merge #88
cbb8822 
88: Deep array indexing r=torkleyy a=kvark

Follow-up to #86 that supports nested arrays (ouch).
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors bot commented Jan 24, 2018

Build succeeded

@bors bors bot merged commit 77e3acf into ron-rs:master Jan 24, 2018
bors bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 24, 2018
@bors
Merge #89
8802d43 
89: [v0.1] Deep array indexing r=torkleyy a=kvark

Brother of #88 for the released branch, bumps version to 0.1.7
@kvark kvark deleted the array-index branch January 24, 2018 19:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@torkleyy torkleyy torkleyy approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@kvark @torkleyy