Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update cryptography to 2.9.2 #407

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

pyup-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

This PR updates cryptography from 2.8 to 2.9.2.

Changelog

2.9.1

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

* Updated Windows, macOS, and ``manylinux`` wheels to be compiled with
OpenSSL 1.1.1g.

.. _v2-9:

2.9

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

* **BACKWARDS INCOMPATIBLE:** Support for Python 3.4 has been removed due to
low usage and maintenance burden.
* **BACKWARDS INCOMPATIBLE:** Support for OpenSSL 1.0.1 has been removed.
Users on older version of OpenSSL will need to upgrade.
* **BACKWARDS INCOMPATIBLE:** Support for LibreSSL 2.6.x has been removed.
* Removed support for calling
:meth:`~cryptography.hazmat.primitives.asymmetric.x25519.X25519PublicKey.public_bytes`
with no arguments, as per our deprecation policy. You must now pass
``encoding`` and ``format``.
* **BACKWARDS INCOMPATIBLE:** Reversed the order in which
:meth:`~cryptography.x509.Name.rfc4514_string` returns the RDNs
as required by :rfc:`4514`.
* Updated Windows, macOS, and ``manylinux`` wheels to be compiled with
OpenSSL 1.1.1f.
* Added support for parsing
:attr:`~cryptography.x509.ocsp.OCSPResponse.single_extensions` in an OCSP
response.
* :class:`~cryptography.x509.NameAttribute` values can now be empty strings.

.. _v2-8:
Links

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 42.065% when pulling 5803b80 on pyup-update-cryptography-2.8-to-2.9.2 into 10a4d82 on master.

@pyup-bot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Closing this in favor of #445

@pyup-bot pyup-bot closed this Jul 21, 2020
@ronin13 ronin13 deleted the pyup-update-cryptography-2.8-to-2.9.2 branch July 21, 2020 03:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants