You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The first PMID is the right one, the others seem unrelated. I can easily work around this by just selecting the first PMID, but is there a bigger issue with related data?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thanks for filing this issue @agbarnett , looks like this is a bug in the way parse_pubmed_xml parses the record (looking for any PMID field, not specifically the one at the top-level of the record).
Will get a fix and test in the next little while. I think you can safetly everything after the first one for now (as the citation info with the correct pmid is in the top of the file).
Prior to this commit, pubmed records hat contained a lit of cited papers
could generate a "pmid" field in teh pubmed record that included all
pmids. This commit fixes bug #131 and provides a test against
regression.
Thanks @agbarnett for the bug report
I'm getting multiple PMIDs when searching for a single PMID, for example:
The first PMID is the right one, the others seem unrelated. I can easily work around this by just selecting the first PMID, but is there a bigger issue with related data?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: