Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Cannot clone repository as out of LFS quota #1

Open
Tobias-Fischer opened this issue Feb 6, 2024 · 6 comments
Open

Cannot clone repository as out of LFS quota #1

Tobias-Fischer opened this issue Feb 6, 2024 · 6 comments

Comments

@Tobias-Fischer
Copy link

Hiya,

When trying to build moveit-resources packages for RoboStack, we face this issue:

This repository is over its data quota. Account responsible for LFS bandwidth should purchase more data packs to restore access.

Could you please take a look?

Many thanks!

@rhaschke
Copy link

rhaschke commented Feb 6, 2024

Probably the repository is simply too large. There is nothing we can do about that. Try cloning shallow?

@Tobias-Fischer
Copy link
Author

I think it’s just the couple of files that are added via LFS. If they were regular files, I don’t think we’d be running into this problem.

@v4hn
Copy link

v4hn commented Feb 6, 2024

git lfs is not required for moveit_resources at the moment (it should also not be used here) and it looks like @sjahr and @henningkayser forgot to remove the .gitattributes for lfs again in moveit/moveit_resources#173 after it was originally added via moveit/moveit_resources#162 last year.

@Tobias-Fischer
Copy link
Author

Thanks @v4hn - opened a PR at moveit/moveit_resources#197

sjahr pushed a commit to moveit/moveit_resources that referenced this issue Feb 7, 2024
@sjahr
Copy link
Contributor

sjahr commented Feb 7, 2024

@Tobias-Fischer Thanks for your PR with the fix! Is this issue fixed by moveit/moveit_resources#197?

@Tobias-Fischer
Copy link
Author

It will be once we have a new release ...

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants