Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Timer tests2 #165

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Nov 18, 2017
Merged

Timer tests2 #165

merged 4 commits into from
Nov 18, 2017

Conversation

mikaelarguedas
Copy link
Member

opening this for visibility, follow up of #163
We decided not to merge this yet to not add more windows flaky tests (all test relying on timing are flaky on Windows, possibly for performance reasons)

@mikaelarguedas mikaelarguedas added in progress Actively being worked on (Kanban column) ready Work is about to start (Kanban column) and removed in progress Actively being worked on (Kanban column) labels Sep 8, 2017
@mikaelarguedas mikaelarguedas self-assigned this Sep 14, 2017
@mikaelarguedas mikaelarguedas added in review Waiting for review (Kanban column) and removed ready Work is about to start (Kanban column) labels Nov 17, 2017
@mikaelarguedas
Copy link
Member Author

mikaelarguedas commented Nov 17, 2017

This requires ros2/rcutils#73

  • Windows Build Status

I'll rerun a full CI for this branch once ros2/rcutils#73 is approved

  • Linux Build Status
  • Linux-aarch64 Build Status
  • macOS Build Status
  • Windows Build Status

@mikaelarguedas
Copy link
Member Author

ros2/rcutils#73 has been merged and I finally got a MacOS job through.
Ready for review

@mikaelarguedas mikaelarguedas merged commit d811463 into master Nov 18, 2017
@mikaelarguedas mikaelarguedas deleted the timer_tests2 branch November 18, 2017 02:21
@mikaelarguedas mikaelarguedas removed the in review Waiting for review (Kanban column) label Nov 18, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants