Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Adapt to action implicit field changes #602

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 7, 2018
Merged

Adapt to action implicit field changes #602

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 7, 2018

Conversation

sloretz
Copy link
Contributor

@sloretz sloretz commented Dec 6, 2018 •
edited
Loading

Connects to ros2/rcl_interfaces#49

Changes are from ros2/rosidl#332

@sloretz sloretz self-assigned this Dec 6, 2018
@sloretz sloretz added in progress Actively being worked on (Kanban column) in review Waiting for review (Kanban column) and removed in progress Actively being worked on (Kanban column) labels Dec 6, 2018
@sloretz sloretz mentioned this pull request Dec 6, 2018
Merged
@sloretz sloretz added this to the crystal milestone Dec 6, 2018
@sloretz
Copy link
Contributor Author

sloretz commented Dec 6, 2018

CI in ros2/rosidl#332 (comment)

@sloretz
Copy link
Contributor Author

sloretz commented Dec 6, 2018

CI again ros2/rosidl#332 (comment)

@sloretz sloretz merged commit ef2014a into master Dec 7, 2018
@sloretz sloretz deleted the change_uuid_type_in_action_msgs branch December 7, 2018 00:42
@sloretz sloretz removed the in review Waiting for review (Kanban column) label Dec 7, 2018
cho3 pushed a commit to cho3/rclcpp that referenced this pull request Jun 3, 2019
@sloretz @christopherho-ApexAI
adapt to action implicit changes (ros2#602)
bae14a2
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@mjcarroll mjcarroll mjcarroll approved these changes

Assignees

@sloretz sloretz

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
crystal
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
2 participants
@sloretz @mjcarroll