Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

field import: preserve generic info #53

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 12, 2017
Merged

Conversation

cal101
Copy link
Collaborator

@cal101 cal101 commented May 1, 2017

No description provided.

CompilationUnit cu = run(genericColumnAccessor);

Assert.assertTrue(true);
//SymbolVisitorAdapterAssertions.assertTypeOfGenericConstant(cu);
Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why are these lines of code commented? Could you add the appropriate assertions in each test case?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

These are the fluent assertions i wrote about via email. Useful but work in progress. Details in email.

Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@cal101 can uncomment the code now?

Copy link
Owner

@rpau rpau left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the contribution! However, some assertions on the tests make describe better which parts needs to be properly evaluated.

@cal101
Copy link
Collaborator Author

cal101 commented May 19, 2017

OK, will take a look at the weekend.

@cal101 cal101 force-pushed the importfields branch 2 times, most recently from 4f2f148 to 60288cd Compare May 19, 2017 20:02
@cal101
Copy link
Collaborator Author

cal101 commented May 19, 2017

Found some rest of energy. Should be done.

@cal101 cal101 force-pushed the importfields branch 2 times, most recently from 401696d to 599e6d4 Compare May 25, 2017 08:45
@cal101
Copy link
Collaborator Author

cal101 commented May 25, 2017

Fixed merge conflict. Should be ready for merge now.

}
}
}
boolean isVisible = Modifier.isPublic(modifiers)
Copy link
Owner

@rpau rpau May 25, 2017

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This code follows a different format than you suggested to me. Could you reformat the code?

@cal101
Copy link
Collaborator Author

cal101 commented May 25, 2017

Sorry. Will take a look at all pull requests when I am back.

@cal101
Copy link
Collaborator Author

cal101 commented May 25, 2017

I see that formatting of the master is not clean, too but I also see that a reformatting changes things I intended to be left alone.
The reformatting reduces readability of some tests.
I will take a look at the formatter config when I am back.
I am sorry for that.

@cal101
Copy link
Collaborator Author

cal101 commented May 26, 2017

reformatted and rebased on master.
But please consider accepting #66 and applying the formatter.

@cal101
Copy link
Collaborator Author

cal101 commented May 28, 2017

Rebased.

@cal101
Copy link
Collaborator Author

cal101 commented Jun 6, 2017

Rebased again.

@cal101
Copy link
Collaborator Author

cal101 commented Jun 12, 2017

Please tell if you have open issues. I consider it ready.

@rpau
Copy link
Owner

rpau commented Jun 12, 2017

Thanks @cal101

@rpau rpau merged commit 18b3e81 into rpau:master Jun 12, 2017
@cal101 cal101 deleted the importfields branch June 13, 2017 05:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants