-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
field import: preserve generic info #53
Conversation
CompilationUnit cu = run(genericColumnAccessor); | ||
|
||
Assert.assertTrue(true); | ||
//SymbolVisitorAdapterAssertions.assertTypeOfGenericConstant(cu); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why are these lines of code commented? Could you add the appropriate assertions in each test case?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
These are the fluent assertions i wrote about via email. Useful but work in progress. Details in email.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@cal101 can uncomment the code now?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the contribution! However, some assertions on the tests make describe better which parts needs to be properly evaluated.
OK, will take a look at the weekend. |
4f2f148
to
60288cd
Compare
Found some rest of energy. Should be done. |
401696d
to
599e6d4
Compare
Fixed merge conflict. Should be ready for merge now. |
} | ||
} | ||
} | ||
boolean isVisible = Modifier.isPublic(modifiers) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This code follows a different format than you suggested to me. Could you reformat the code?
Sorry. Will take a look at all pull requests when I am back. |
I see that formatting of the master is not clean, too but I also see that a reformatting changes things I intended to be left alone. |
reformatted and rebased on master. |
Rebased. |
Rebased again. |
Please tell if you have open issues. I consider it ready. |
Thanks @cal101 |
No description provided.