Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support clipping Sigma to avoid negative values in French-Wilson method #237

Merged
merged 11 commits into from
Jan 9, 2024

Conversation

DHekstra
Copy link
Contributor

I added a flag permitting clipping of Iobs to positive values for the purpose of calculating Sigma during anisotropic FW calculation. The option is off by default.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Dec 17, 2023

Codecov Report

Attention: 1 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (0e2f5e2) 92.39% compared to head (a34429a) 92.36%.
Report is 7 commits behind head on main.

❗ Current head a34429a differs from pull request most recent head ca49796. Consider uploading reports for the commit ca49796 to get more accurate results

Files Patch % Lines
...alspaceship/algorithms/scale_merged_intensities.py 66.66% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #237      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   92.39%   92.36%   -0.04%     
==========================================
  Files          37       37              
  Lines        2434     2436       +2     
==========================================
+ Hits         2249     2250       +1     
- Misses        185      186       +1     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 92.36% <66.66%> (-0.04%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@kmdalton
Copy link
Member

Wouldn't it make more sense to clip the returned values rather than the input intensities? This version of the code adds small errors to all miller indices rather than just the ones which would be assigned negative average intensities.

@DHekstra
Copy link
Contributor Author

are you proposing clipping Sigma or the FW'ed intensities?

@kmdalton
Copy link
Member

Sigma

@DHekstra
Copy link
Contributor Author

cool. makes sense.

@DHekstra
Copy link
Contributor Author

OK, this seems to do the trick. Clipping sigma to a user-specified small positive value (too small results in numerical warnings).

@DHekstra
Copy link
Contributor Author

import reciprocalspaceship as rs
import numpy as np

ds=rs.read_mtz('pipeline/data/mtzs_origin/111.mtz')
ds_out=rs.algorithms.scale_merged_intensities(\
        ds, \
        intensity_key="IMEAN", \
        sigma_key="SIGIMEAN", \
        output_columns=["IP","SIGIP","FP","SIGFP"], \
        dropna=True, \
        inplace=False, \
        mean_intensity_method='anisotropic', \
        bw=2.0,
        clip_neg_Sigma=False,
        eps=0.0,
    )

produces

print(np.sum(np.isnan(ds_out["FP"].to_numpy())))

22238

ds_out=rs.algorithms.scale_merged_intensities(
ds,
intensity_key="IMEAN",
sigma_key="SIGIMEAN",
output_columns=["IP","SIGIP","FP","SIGFP"],
dropna=True,
inplace=False,
mean_intensity_method='anisotropic',
bw=2.0,
clip_neg_Sigma=True,
eps=0.1,
)

produces

print(np.sum(np.isnan(ds_out["FP"].to_numpy())))
0

@kmdalton
Copy link
Member

I think it's better to just have a single new parameter, minimum_sigma=-np.inf

@JBGreisman JBGreisman changed the title Fw fix Support clipping Sigma to avoid negative values in French-Wilson method Dec 21, 2023
@JBGreisman JBGreisman added API Interface Decisions enhancement Improvement to existing feature labels Dec 21, 2023
@DHekstra
Copy link
Contributor Author

DHekstra commented Dec 21, 2023

Let me know how this looks. I switched to using a single flag minimum_sigma as @kmdalton suggested, with a default value of -np.inf (no minimum). Because some of the ~440 datasets I tested this on also yielded some negative Sigma with the isotropic method, I moved the clipping into scale_merged_intensities() itself. I am applying the clipping before multiplication by the multiplicity as that strikes me as most appropriate. Let me know how this looks.

@kmdalton
Copy link
Member

I am happy with this change. There might be a better parameter name (mea culpa), but otherwise this is the least invasive patch I can think of. Let's ask @JBGreisman for comments before merging, but I'm plenty satisfied.

Copy link
Member

@JBGreisman JBGreisman left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks fine to me -- I agree that it makes sense to have the default behavior as unchanged relative to before, and the proposed call to np.clip seems fine for getting this functionality.

@DHekstra DHekstra merged commit 66b7ba2 into main Jan 9, 2024
6 checks passed
@kmdalton kmdalton deleted the fw_fix branch September 11, 2024 15:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
API Interface Decisions enhancement Improvement to existing feature
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants