Proposal: A customizable ConsoleWriter output #84
Comments
|
Yes, as long as it is backward compatible. |
|
...and does not add extra dependencies. |
|
Hi, understood about dependencies, but can you be more specific about "backwards compatibility" — as far as I understand it, the output type is just |
|
Just make sure that the current API of the ConsoleWriter still works. Seems like it should not be an issue with the way you pass configuration. |
karmi
added a commit
to karmi/zerolog
that referenced
this issue
Jul 28, 2018
In order to allow customizing the console output, the `zerolog.ConsoleWriter` output has been refactored, with the formatting logic extracted to separate functions in `consoleFormatters`, and with the `SetFormatter()` method to re-define the defaults. Also, the default has been changed to be more sparse and visually attractive. The logic has been extracted from an external prototype package at <https://github.com/karmi/consolelog>. A comprehensive example has been added to the README, and a number of tests has been added as well. Closes rs#84
karmi
added a commit
to karmi/zerolog
that referenced
this issue
Jul 28, 2018
In order to allow customizing the console output, the `zerolog.ConsoleWriter` output has been refactored, with the formatting logic extracted to separate functions in `consoleFormatters`, and with the `SetFormatter()` method to re-define the defaults. Also, the default has been changed to be more sparse and visually attractive. The logic has been extracted from an external prototype package at <https://github.com/karmi/consolelog>. A comprehensive example has been added to the README, and a number of tests has been added as well. Closes rs#84
karmi
added a commit
to karmi/zerolog
that referenced
this issue
Jul 30, 2018
In order to allow customizing the console output, the `zerolog.ConsoleWriter` output has been refactored, with the formatting logic extracted to separate functions in `consoleFormatters`, and with the `SetFormatter()` method to re-define the defaults. Also, the default has been changed to be more sparse and visually attractive. The logic has been extracted from an external prototype package at <https://github.com/karmi/consolelog>. A comprehensive example has been added to the README, and a number of tests has been added as well. Closes rs#84
karmi
added a commit
to karmi/zerolog
that referenced
this issue
Jul 30, 2018
In order to allow customizing the console output, the `zerolog.ConsoleWriter` output has been refactored, with the formatting logic extracted to separate functions in `consoleFormatters`, and with the `SetFormatter()` method to re-define the defaults. Also, the default has been changed to be more sparse and visually attractive. The logic has been extracted from an external prototype package at <https://github.com/karmi/consolelog>. A comprehensive example has been added to the README, and a number of tests has been added as well. Closes rs#84
karmi
added a commit
to karmi/zerolog
that referenced
this issue
Oct 29, 2018
In order to allow customizing the console output, the `zerolog.ConsoleWriter` output has been refactored, with the formatting logic extracted to separate functions in `consoleFormatters`, and with the `SetFormatter()` method to re-define the defaults. Also, the default has been changed to be more sparse and visually attractive. The logic has been extracted from an external prototype package at <https://github.com/karmi/consolelog>. A comprehensive example has been added to the README, and a number of tests has been added as well. Closes rs#84
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Hello, I've recently used
zerologin a project, and I like it very much — many thanks!One thing I wanted to change was the
ConsoleWriteroutput: I wanted to format the output differently, I wanted to highlight field values, not field names, etc. So I wrote a custom implementation, looking like this (adapting the output fromzerolog's README):I've realized that my needs are probably not unique (see #34), and that it would be nice to expose a customizable
ConsoleWriter. Therefore, I've extracted what I did in the project into a library, available at https://github.com/karmi/consolelog, since I didn't want to just blindly send code your way.My question is: is this something you would consider interesting to have in the
zerologlibrary itself? If so, I can move the implementation into a patch and send a pull request.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: