-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Array slice selector (forward, positive bounds) [<start>:<end>:<step>]
#152
Labels
Milestone
Comments
Tagging @V0ldek for notifications |
V0ldek
changed the title
Array slice selector
Array slice selector (forward, positive bounds) Jun 14, 2023
[<start>:<end>:<step>]
github-actions
bot
added
acceptance: go ahead
Reviewed, implementation can start
and removed
acceptance: triage
Waiting for owner's input
labels
Jun 15, 2023
V0ldek
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 27, 2024
- Simple slicing: forward step and positive bounds. Includes an overhaul to how array transitions are compiled. Ref: #152
V0ldek
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 27, 2024
- Simple slicing: forward step and positive bounds. Includes an overhaul to how array transitions are compiled. Ref: #152
V0ldek
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 27, 2024
- Simple slicing: forward step and positive bounds. Includes an overhaul to how array transitions are compiled. Ref: #152
V0ldek
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 27, 2024
- Simple slicing: forward step and positive bounds. Includes an overhaul to how array transitions are compiled. Ref: #152
github-actions
bot
removed
the
acceptance: go ahead
Reviewed, implementation can start
label
Mar 27, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Implementation of the slice selector
[<start>:<end>:<step>]
for positive steps and positive bounds.Describe the solution you'd like
Slice for positive steps should be similar to the regular index selector. There are no extraordinary challenges, storing the current index as part of the state should suffice (we already do this for index selectors), and the output is in regular order.
Additional context
RFC draft
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: