Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix labels with bindEvent() #3160

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Nov 23, 2020
Merged

Fix labels with bindEvent() #3160

merged 3 commits into from
Nov 23, 2020

Conversation

wch
Copy link
Collaborator

@wch wch commented Nov 20, 2020

This is for rstudio/shinycoreci-apps#83.

The reactive graph now looks like this:
image

Note that the new private$currentThemeDependency node was introduced by #3116, and is expected.

This also changes the behavior of observe() %>% bindEvent() so that the original observer is modified in place.

Comment on lines +255 to +256
if (x$.execCount > 0) {
stop("Cannot call bindEvent() on an Observer that has already been executed.")
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you!

@schloerke
Copy link
Collaborator

/document

@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLA assistant check
Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you all sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.
1 out of 2 committers have signed the CLA.

✅ wch
❌ runner


runner seems not to be a GitHub user. You need a GitHub account to be able to sign the CLA. If you have already a GitHub account, please add the email address used for this commit to your account.
You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.

@MadhulikaTanuboddi
Copy link

Expected reactlog after the changes from #3206

Dec22-194-new-snapshot

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants