Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Daemons: Remove VO-specifics from replica-recoverer #6396 #6764

Merged

Conversation

voetberg
Copy link
Contributor

@voetberg voetberg commented May 7, 2024

Using the config to set if the datatype of a replica can be determined via the metadata (metadata[datatype] is not used by all experiments), and uses an rse-expression from the config to redetermine the RSE to use for recovery (removing hardcoded type=SCRATCHDISK). Does not interfere with ATLAS defaults, but does allow more flexibility in the daemons.

Related to PR #6444
cc: @haozturk

@voetberg voetberg marked this pull request as ready for review May 10, 2024 14:01
@cserf cserf requested review from ChristophAmes and cserf May 13, 2024 08:07
cserf
cserf previously approved these changes May 13, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@cserf cserf left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me but would be good also to have approval from @ChristophAmes

ChristophAmes
ChristophAmes previously approved these changes May 13, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@ChristophAmes ChristophAmes left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me.

@voetberg voetberg dismissed stale reviews from ChristophAmes and cserf via 62938ab May 13, 2024 13:40
@voetberg voetberg force-pushed the feature-6396-replica_recovery_vo_agnostism branch from 70073c3 to 62938ab Compare May 13, 2024 13:40
expression for an rse to use to filter rse's for recovery; Fix rucio#6396
@voetberg voetberg force-pushed the feature-6396-replica_recovery_vo_agnostism branch from 62938ab to be37a81 Compare May 13, 2024 14:21
@voetberg voetberg requested a review from rdimaio May 13, 2024 15:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants