Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Schematics usability #20

Closed
rusefillc opened this issue Jan 16, 2022 · 5 comments
Closed

Schematics usability #20

rusefillc opened this issue Jan 16, 2022 · 5 comments
Assignees
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation NEXT-REV

Comments

@rusefillc
Copy link
Contributor

rusefillc commented Jan 16, 2022

IN_MAP is IN_MAP2 and IN_MAP2 is IN_MAP3?

that's not amazing schematics readability in my opinion.

image

@rusefillc rusefillc added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Jan 16, 2022
@rusefillc
Copy link
Contributor Author

We cannot change blue names since those are shared Hellen names, let's change black names since those are board specific.

Let's change black "IN_MAP" into "INP_MAP" and black IN_MAP2 into INP_MAP2?

@mck1117
Copy link

mck1117 commented Jan 17, 2022

What is INP? Why not internal and external MAP?

@rusefillc
Copy link
Contributor Author

INP_* is the smallest change to remove all conflicts between black and blue

I agree that INT_MAP and EXT_MAP would be even better black net names!

@andreika-git
Copy link
Collaborator

done
image

@rusefillc
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thank you that's progress for sure!

Open question in black should better be IN_MAP2 or INP_MAP2 at this point I've lost track of what are the arguments supporting which side, at least we've address IN_MAP2 drama

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation NEXT-REV
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants