Rename master branch to main

[amanjeev]

In the light of continuing removing outright offensive language from the project, consider renaming master to main.

Earlier discussion about offensive words was in #1812

Things that might break:

• CI
• ???

Note: master and main runs into the issue that there may be branches out there that rely on pulling master. A solution can be a symbolic-ref: git symbolic-ref refs/heads/master refs/heads/main

[kulp]

If we do this, I think we should find out what comparable projects have made the same kind of transition, so we can learn from any pitfalls they encountered.

[emilio]

Renaming this sounds ok to me fwiw.

[glandium]

Note that AFAIK, github doesn't support symbolic refs. which means it's impossible to make the transition transparent to people with existing clones.

[pvdrz]

Just a random idea: We could transition to main and then abuse our CI scripts to keep master in sync with main for a while.

Edit: I don't know if this is actually possible, but it sounds like it should be.

[kulp]

I don't know if this is actually possible, but it sounds like it should be.

I think this would be:

git push origin origin/main:refs/heads/master

[amanjeev]

I have created a new branch, main, off of master. I also have the workflow here to automatically merge main -> master. See my branch : https://github.com/ferrous-systems/rust-bindgen/blob/amanjeev/set-default-branch-as-main/.github/workflows/sync-master-from-main.yml

I "tested" this within ferrous' fork of bindgen. Please let me know if there are any concerns.

[pvdrz]

@amanjeev is this workflow being triggered if someone opens a PR against main? because I think it should only run on pushes to main

[amanjeev]

@pvdrz and I chatted and it seems my solution had "pull_request" trigger too which we do not want. I have removed it. I will open a PR soon.