-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Don't lint manual_non_exhaustive
when the enum variant is used
#8645
Conversation
r? @xFrednet (rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
5e84122
to
b0f8a31
Compare
This looks good to me, thank you for the implementation! I've marked one question, if this change was intentional, you can @bors d+ |
📌 Commit b0f8a31 has been approved by |
Don't lint `manual_non_exhaustive` when the enum variant is used fixes #5714 changelog: Don't lint `manual_non_exhaustive` when the enum variant is used
It seems like bors was a bit too quick and took my inline code mention as the real one 😅 @bors r- |
Looks like I messed up with some commands. Let's try this again: @bors delegate+ |
✌️ @Jarcho can now approve this pull request |
@bors r+ |
📌 Commit b0f8a31 has been approved by |
☀️ Test successful - checks-action_dev_test, checks-action_remark_test, checks-action_test |
fixes #5714
changelog: Don't lint
manual_non_exhaustive
when the enum variant is used