Tracking issue for Consistent no-prelude attribute (RFC 501)

[aturon]

rust-lang/rfcs#501

[aturon]

cc @Kimundi

[bombless]

I think in theory primitive type definitions come from std::*.
So if no_std or no_prelude is on there should not been primitive type definitions.
And I suggest we make alias of primitive types to a place like std::primitive_definition::*, so we write codes below to perform as no_std today:

#![no_std]
use std::primitive_definition::*

I know this change sounds trivial but current behavior is pretty ugly, see #22093
cc @mahkoh

[steveklabnik]

Triage: so. This RFC happened pre-1.0, yet never landed. And it seems no_implicit_prelude does work on stable today. So, this would have to not be a re-naming, but a deprecation + new name?

[Kimundi]

Seems there has been a patch to implement this early this year, but it bitrottet: #32025

[pnkfelix]

@rustbot label +S-tracking-design-concerns

As noted by @petrochenkov here and @oli-obk here, its not clear if this change is still well-motivated.

[pnkfelix]

Discussed at today's T-compiler backlog bonanza.

I propose we close this until someone who can drive it comes forward and can motivate doing this at this point.

@rfcbot fcp close

[rfcbot]

Team member @pnkfelix has proposed to close this. The next step is review by the rest of the tagged team members:

• @Aaron1011
• @cjgillot
• @davidtwco
• @eddyb
• @estebank
• @lcnr
• @matthewjasper
• @michaelwoerister
• @nagisa
• @nikomatsakis
• @oli-obk
• @petrochenkov
• @pnkfelix
• @wesleywiser

No concerns currently listed.

Once a majority of reviewers approve (and at most 2 approvals are outstanding), this will enter its final comment period. If you spot a major issue that hasn't been raised at any point in this process, please speak up!

See this document for info about what commands tagged team members can give me.

[rfcbot]

🔔 This is now entering its final comment period, as per the review above. 🔔

[rfcbot]

The final comment period, with a disposition to close, as per the review above, is now complete.

As the automated representative of the governance process, I would like to thank the author for their work and everyone else who contributed.

[lcnr]

I propose we close this until someone who can drive it comes forward and can motivate doing this at this point.