Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve the check_pat_enum logic #32039

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 4, 2016
Merged

Improve the check_pat_enum logic #32039

merged 2 commits into from
Mar 4, 2016

Conversation

arielb1
Copy link
Contributor

@arielb1 arielb1 commented Mar 4, 2016

Fixes #32004

r? @eddyb

fn main() {
match Foo::Baz {
Foo::Bar => {}
//~^ ERROR this pattern has 0 fields, but the corresponding
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could you expand the expected message to also include “variant” here?

@nagisa
Copy link
Member

nagisa commented Mar 4, 2016

@bors r+ f40d12f

Looks good to me.

@nagisa
Copy link
Member

nagisa commented Mar 4, 2016

I nominate this for beta since this fixes a regression from stable to nightly (now beta) and we recently had a release.

@nagisa nagisa added the beta-nominated Nominated for backporting to the compiler in the beta channel. label Mar 4, 2016
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 4, 2016

⌛ Testing commit f40d12f with merge d31d8a9...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 4, 2016
@bors bors merged commit f40d12f into rust-lang:master Mar 4, 2016
@nikomatsakis nikomatsakis added the beta-accepted Accepted for backporting to the compiler in the beta channel. label Mar 10, 2016
@brson brson removed the beta-nominated Nominated for backporting to the compiler in the beta channel. label Mar 22, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
beta-accepted Accepted for backporting to the compiler in the beta channel.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants