Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add links from core::cmp derives to their traits #109947

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 14, 2023

Conversation

clubby789
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes #109946
Adds intra-doc links from the core::cmp derives to their respective traits, and a link to their derive behaviour

@rustbot label +A-docs

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Apr 4, 2023

r? @m-ou-se

(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Apr 4, 2023
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Apr 4, 2023

Hey! It looks like you've submitted a new PR for the library teams!

If this PR contains changes to any rust-lang/rust public library APIs then please comment with @rustbot label +T-libs-api -T-libs to tag it appropriately. If this PR contains changes to any unstable APIs please edit the PR description to add a link to the relevant API Change Proposal or create one if you haven't already. If you're unsure where your change falls no worries, just leave it as is and the reviewer will take a look and make a decision to forward on if necessary.

Examples of T-libs-api changes:

  • Stabilizing library features
  • Introducing insta-stable changes such as new implementations of existing stable traits on existing stable types
  • Introducing new or changing existing unstable library APIs (excluding permanently unstable features / features without a tracking issue)
  • Changing public documentation in ways that create new stability guarantees
  • Changing observable runtime behavior of library APIs

@rustbot rustbot added the A-docs Area: documentation for any part of the project, including the compiler, standard library, and tools label Apr 4, 2023
@JohnTitor
Copy link
Member

Thank you!
r? @JohnTitor @bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 14, 2023

📌 Commit 8d4cccd has been approved by JohnTitor

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@rustbot rustbot assigned JohnTitor and unassigned m-ou-se Apr 14, 2023
@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Apr 14, 2023
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 14, 2023
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 7 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#108687 (Reformulate `point_at_expr_source_of_inferred_type` to be more accurate)
 - rust-lang#109272 (Add Command environment variable inheritance docs)
 - rust-lang#109947 (Add links from `core::cmp` derives to their traits)
 - rust-lang#110110 (Use `Display` in top-level example for `PanicInfo`)
 - rust-lang#110154 (Fix typos in library)
 - rust-lang#110244 (Remove some unneeded imports / qualified paths)
 - rust-lang#110328 ([rustdoc] Add explanations for auto-disambiguation when an intra doc link is resolved to a proc-macro and a trait at the same time)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 4b8351f into rust-lang:master Apr 14, 2023
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.70.0 milestone Apr 14, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-docs Area: documentation for any part of the project, including the compiler, standard library, and tools S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Ord and PartialOrd derives do not specify ordering behavior types with multiple fields
5 participants