Rollup of 5 pull requests

[matthiaskrgr]

Successful merges:

• Add as_(mut_)ptr and as_(mut_)slice to raw array pointers #119411 (Add as_(mut_)ptr and as_(mut_)slice to raw array pointers)
• Respect stage0 sysroot when compiling rmake.rs with COMPILETEST_FORCE_STAGE0 #122248 (Respect stage0 sysroot when compiling rmake.rs with COMPILETEST_FORCE_STAGE0)
• mir-opt: always run tests for the current target #122295 (mir-opt: always run tests for the current target)
• Register LLVM handlers for bad-alloc / OOM #122574 (Register LLVM handlers for bad-alloc / OOM)
• Move check-cfg diagnostic logic into a separate file #122608 (Move check-cfg diagnostic logic into a separate file)

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

[matthiaskrgr]

@bors r+ rollup=never p=5

[bors]

📌 Commit 325678c has been approved by matthiaskrgr

It is now in the queue for this repository.

[bors]

⌛ Testing commit 325678c with merge ecdea9e...

[bors]

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: matthiaskrgr
Pushing ecdea9e to master...

[rust-timer]

📌 Perf builds for each rolled up PR:

PR#	Message	Perf Build Sha
#119411	Add as_(mut_)ptr and as_(mut_)slice to raw array pointers	82eaa6473e1fd380186d29056cf9a5a08f3f6f76 (link)
#122248	Respect stage0 sysroot when compiling rmake.rs with COMPILE…	3fb7e4e7880976e46101723f6f71845d7f821497 (link)
#122295	mir-opt: always run tests for the current target	a97837a1906d42289b90644cd531a9ba20d192b7 (link)
#122574	Register LLVM handlers for bad-alloc / OOM	7225cab63f7c30081e1def58dfc429f9a5a1a3a8 (link)
#122608	Move check-cfg diagnostic logic into a separate file	f53929a320f6842d627bbfb633450b734236e80a (link)

previous master: 1eb882ef6d

In the case of a perf regression, run the following command for each PR you suspect might be the cause: @rust-timer build $SHA

[rust-log-analyzer]

A job failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)

##[endgroup]
Starting download for Cargo-lock
Directory structure has been setup for the artifact
Total number of files that will be downloaded: 1
Artifact Cargo-lock was downloaded to /home/runner/work/rust/rust
##[group]Run actions/download-artifact@v3
with:
  name: cargo-updates
---
##[endgroup]
Starting download for cargo-updates
Directory structure has been setup for the artifact
Total number of files that will be downloaded: 1
Skipping download validation.
Artifact cargo-updates was downloaded to /home/runner/work/rust/rust
##[group]Run echo "${COMMIT_MESSAGE}" > commit.txt
echo "${COMMIT_MESSAGE}" > commit.txt
echo "${COMMIT_MESSAGE}" > commit.txt
cat cargo_update.log >> commit.txt

echo "${PR_MESSAGE}" > body.md
echo '```txt' >> body.md
cat cargo_update.log >> body.md
echo '```' >> body.md
shell: /usr/bin/bash --noprofile --norc -e -o pipefail {0}
env:
  RUSTC_BOOTSTRAP: 1
  PR_TITLE: Weekly `cargo update`
  PR_MESSAGE: Automation to keep dependencies in `Cargo.lock` current.
following is the output from `cargo update`:
  COMMIT_MESSAGE: cargo update 
##[endgroup]
##[group]Run git config user.name github-actions
git config user.name github-actions
git config user.email github-actions@github.com
git switch --force-create cargo_update
git add ./Cargo.lock
git commit --no-verify --file=commit.txt
---
##[endgroup]
Switched to a new branch 'cargo_update'
On branch cargo_update
Untracked files:
  (use "git add <file>..." to include in what will be committed)
 body.md
 commit.txt


nothing added to commit but untracked files present (use "git add" to track)
##[error]Process completed with exit code 1.

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (ecdea9e): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌ regressions - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	1.0%	[0.4%, 1.7%]	2
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	2.3%	[2.2%, 2.5%]	3
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	3.7%	[1.7%, 5.3%]	15
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-2.6%	[-2.6%, -2.6%]	1
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	1.1%	[-2.6%, 2.5%]	4

Cycles

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-3.7%	[-8.0%, -2.1%]	11
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 666.919s -> 667.964s (0.16%)
Artifact size: 312.80 MiB -> 312.79 MiB (-0.00%)