On suggesting #![recursion_limit = "X"], note current crate name
#68840
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rust-highfive
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
estebank
reviewed
Feb 5, 2020
Centril
force-pushed
the
rec-lim-curr-crate
branch
from
b14dcae
to
ea871ed
Compare
|
r=me on the code changes, but I am really surprised about some of the |
Centril
force-pushed
the
rec-lim-curr-crate
branch
from
ea871ed
to
01dd376
Compare
|
Fixed the unrelated |
|
📌 Commit 01dd376 has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Centril
added a commit
to Centril/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 5, 2020
On suggesting `#![recursion_limit = "X"]`, note current crate name This would have saved me much confusion e.g. when reading the log output in rust-lang#68788 (comment). r? @estebank
Centril
added a commit
to Centril/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 5, 2020
On suggesting `#![recursion_limit = "X"]`, note current crate name This would have saved me much confusion e.g. when reading the log output in rust-lang#68788 (comment). r? @estebank
Dylan-DPC-zz
pushed a commit
to Dylan-DPC-zz/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 5, 2020
On suggesting `#![recursion_limit = "X"]`, note current crate name This would have saved me much confusion e.g. when reading the log output in rust-lang#68788 (comment). r? @estebank
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 5, 2020
Rollup of 8 pull requests Successful merges: - #68762 (Strip unnecessary subexpression) - #68790 (Improve `merge_from_succ`) - #68809 (Make more arithmetic functions unstably const) - #68832 (Clean up E0264, E0267 and E0268 explanations) - #68840 (On suggesting `#![recursion_limit = "X"]`, note current crate name) - #68846 (doc fix on doc attribute) - #68851 (Fix issue number of `capacity` method) - #68858 (Merge item id stable hashing functions) Failed merges: r? @ghost
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 6, 2020
Rollup of 8 pull requests Successful merges: - #68762 (Strip unnecessary subexpression) - #68790 (Improve `merge_from_succ`) - #68809 (Make more arithmetic functions unstably const) - #68832 (Clean up E0264, E0267 and E0268 explanations) - #68840 (On suggesting `#![recursion_limit = "X"]`, note current crate name) - #68846 (doc fix on doc attribute) - #68851 (Fix issue number of `capacity` method) - #68858 (Merge item id stable hashing functions) Failed merges: r? @ghost
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This would have saved me much confusion e.g. when reading the log output in #68788 (comment).
r? @estebank