Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Strip unnecessary subexpression #68762

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 6, 2020
Merged

Strip unnecessary subexpression #68762

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 6, 2020

Conversation

ForNeVeR
Copy link
Contributor

@ForNeVeR ForNeVeR commented Feb 2, 2020

It became unnecessary since a06baa5 reformatted the file. The comment is currently a bit misleading.

It became unnecessary since a06baa5 reformatted the file.
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @alexcrichton (or someone else) soon.

If any changes to this PR are deemed necessary, please add them as extra commits. This ensures that the reviewer can see what has changed since they last reviewed the code. Due to the way GitHub handles out-of-date commits, this should also make it reasonably obvious what issues have or haven't been addressed. Large or tricky changes may require several passes of review and changes.

Please see the contribution instructions for more information.

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Feb 2, 2020
@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

@bors: r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 4, 2020

📌 Commit b0a9e94 has been approved by alexcrichton

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Feb 4, 2020
Centril added a commit to Centril/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 5, 2020
Strip unnecessary subexpression

It became unnecessary since a06baa5 reformatted the file. The comment is currently a bit misleading.
Centril added a commit to Centril/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 5, 2020
Strip unnecessary subexpression

It became unnecessary since a06baa5 reformatted the file. The comment is currently a bit misleading.
Dylan-DPC-zz pushed a commit to Dylan-DPC-zz/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 5, 2020
Strip unnecessary subexpression

It became unnecessary since a06baa5 reformatted the file. The comment is currently a bit misleading.
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 5, 2020
Rollup of 8 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #68762 (Strip unnecessary subexpression)
 - #68790 (Improve `merge_from_succ`)
 - #68809 (Make more arithmetic functions unstably const)
 - #68832 (Clean up E0264, E0267 and E0268 explanations)
 - #68840 (On suggesting `#![recursion_limit = "X"]`, note current crate name)
 - #68846 (doc fix on doc attribute)
 - #68851 (Fix issue number of `capacity` method)
 - #68858 (Merge item id stable hashing functions)

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 6, 2020
Rollup of 8 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #68762 (Strip unnecessary subexpression)
 - #68790 (Improve `merge_from_succ`)
 - #68809 (Make more arithmetic functions unstably const)
 - #68832 (Clean up E0264, E0267 and E0268 explanations)
 - #68840 (On suggesting `#![recursion_limit = "X"]`, note current crate name)
 - #68846 (doc fix on doc attribute)
 - #68851 (Fix issue number of `capacity` method)
 - #68858 (Merge item id stable hashing functions)

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@bors bors merged commit b0a9e94 into rust-lang:master Feb 6, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants